[1]刘淑娟,侯杰,张乐乐,等.SMILE手术矫治中高度近视术后角膜上皮重塑及其与屈光度的关系[J].眼科新进展,2017,37(11):1060-1063.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0268]
 LIU Shu-Juan,HOU Jie,ZHANG Le-Le,et al.Corneal epithelial remodeling and its relationship with diopter after SMILE for moderate and high myopia[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2017,37(11):1060-1063.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0268]
点击复制

SMILE手术矫治中高度近视术后角膜上皮重塑及其与屈光度的关系/HTML
分享到:

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2017年11期
页码:
1060-1063
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2017-11-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Corneal epithelial remodeling and its relationship with diopter after SMILE for moderate and high myopia
作者:
刘淑娟侯杰张乐乐雷玉琳郑秀云
250200 山东省济南市,济南市明水眼科医院眼视光科
Author(s):
LIU Shu-JuanHOU JieZHANG Le-LeLEI Yu-LinZHENG Xiu-Yun
Department of Optometry,Jinan Mingshui Eye Hospital,Jinan 250200,Shandong Province,China
关键词:
近视飞秒激光飞秒激光小切口角膜微透镜取出术角膜上皮
Keywords:
myopiafemtosecond lasersmall incision lenticule extractioncorneal epithelial
分类号:
R778
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0268
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨飞秒激光小切口角膜微透镜取出术(small incision lenticule extraction,SMILE)矫治中高度近视术后角膜上皮厚度变化及其与术后屈光度变化的关系。方法 收集2016年1月至2017年3月接受SMILE手术的近视及近视散光患者共46例(92眼),按照屈光度分为两组,其中中度近视组29例(58眼),高度近视组17例(34眼)。分别于术前、术后1个月及6个月应用傅立叶域眼前节OCT对患者角膜中央 0~2 mm、角膜>2~5 mm、角膜>5~6 mm的角膜上皮厚度进行测量,对比术后角膜上皮厚度变化特点并分析其与屈光度的相关性。结果 术前患者角膜上皮厚度为(55.68±3.61)μm,术后6个月角膜中央0~2 mm、角膜>2~5 mm、角膜>5~6 mm的角膜上皮厚度较术前分别增厚(3.85±3.99)μm、(3.46±3.29)μm及(2.85±3.18)μm,三个区域比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月高度近视组角膜上皮增厚较中度近视组更明显,且差异有统计学意义(P=-0.047)。术后6个月,两组角膜中央2 mm上皮厚度变化与术后屈光度变化均未发现显著相关性(中度组:r=0.219,P=0.633;高度组:r=0.197,P=0.585)。结论 SMILE术后角膜上皮发生重塑,主要表现为角膜上皮厚度的增厚,屈光度越高,增厚越显著,这种重塑效应未对术后屈光度稳定性造成影响。
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the changes in epithelial thickness profile and its relationship with diopter following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate and high myopia.Methods Together 46 myopia or myopic astigmatism (92 eyes) who underwent SMILE were included under the informed consent from January 2016 to March 2017 and were decided into 2 groups according to the diopter:moderate myopia group (58 eyes)and high myopia group (34 eyes).Epithelial thickness profile was measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography at different corneal zones (0-2 mm,>2-5 mm and >5-6 mm cornea) preoperatively before surgery and 1 month and 6 months after surgery for observing the changes in epithelial thickness and its correction with diopter.Results The mean epithelial thickness in the central zone was (55.68±3.61) μm before surgery,and,6 months after surgery,it was thickened by (3.85±3.99),(3.46±3.29) and (2.85±3.18)μm in the 0-2 mm,>2-5 mm and >5-6 mm cornea respectively,and the difference was statistically significant among the three zones (P<0.01).After surgery for 6 months,the epithelial thickness in the high myopia group was thickened more obviously compared with the moderate myopia group (t=1.440,P=-0.047).And no correlation was found between changes in the epithelial thickness at 0-2 mm cornea and diopter after surgery(moderate myopia group:r=0.219,P=0.633;high myopia group:r=0.197,P=0.585).Conclusion Significant epithelial thickening was observed after SMILE,presenting the thickened epithelium.The higher the diopter was,the more thickened the epithelium was.The epithelial changes does not appear to affect the diopter after SMILE.

参考文献/References:

[1] VOGT A.Textbook and atlas of slit lamp microscopy of the living eye[M].Bonn:Wayenborgh Editions,1981:151.
[2] CHEN X,STOJANOVIC A,LIU Y,CHEN Y,ZHOU Y,UTHEIM TP.Postoperative changes in corneal epithelial and stromal thickness profiles after photorefractive keratectomy in treatment of myopia[J].J Refract Surg,2015,31(7):446-453.
[3] ROCHA KM,KRUEGER RR.Spectral-Domain optical coherence tomography epithelial and flap thickness mapping in femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis[J].Am J Ophthalmol,2014,158(2):293-301.
[4] PATEL SV,ERIE JC,MCLAREN JW,BOURNE WM.Confocal microscopy changes in epithelial and stromal thickness up to 7 years after LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia[J].J Refract Surg,2007,23(4):385-392.
[5] PIERO DP,TEUS MA.Clinical outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis[J].J Cataract Refract Surg,2016,42(7):1078-1093.
[6] KAMIYA K,SHIMIZU K,IGARASHI A,KOBASHI H.Effect of femtosecond laser setting on visual performance after small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia[J].Br J Ophthalmol,2015,99(10):1381-1387.
[7] GAUTHIER CA,HOLDEN BA,EPSTEIN D,TENGROTH B,FAGERHOLM P,HAMBERG-NYSTRM H.Factors affecting epithelial hyperplasia after photorefractive keratectomy[J].J Cataract Refract Surg,1997,23(7):1042-1050.
[8] LUFT N,RING MH,DIRISAMER M,MURSCH-EDLMAYR AS,PRETZL J,BOLZ M,et al.Semiautomated SD-OCT measurements of corneal sublayer thickness in normal and post-SMILE eyes[J].Cornea,2016,35(7):972-979.
[9] REINSTEIN DZ,ARCHER TJ,GOBBE M,SILVERMAN RH,COLEMAN DJ.Epithelial thickness in the normal cornea:three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound[J].J Refract Surg,2008,24(6):571-581.
[10] KANELLOPOULOS AJ,ASIMELLIS G.In vivo three-dimensio-nal corneal epithelium imaging in normal eyes by anterior-segment optical coherence tomography:a clinical reference study[J].Cornea,2013,32(11):1493-1498.
[11] LI Y,TAN O,BRASS R,WEISS JL,HUANG D.Corneal epithelial thickness mapping by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconic eyes[J].Ophthalmology,2012,119(12):2425-2433.
[12] IVARSEN A,FLEDELIUS W,HJORTDAL JO.Three-year changes in epithelial and stromal thickness after PRK or LASIK for high myopia[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2009,50(5):2061-2066.
[13] HOU J,WANG Y,LEI Y,ZHENG X,ZHANG Y.Corneal epithelial remodeling and its effect on corneal asphericity after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy for myopia[J].J Ophthalmol,2016,2016:8582362.
[14] ZHANG Y,SHEN Q,JIA Y,ZHOU D,ZHOU J.Clinical outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK used to treat myopia:a meta-analysis[J].J Refract Surg,2016,32(4):256-265.
[15] GANESH S,BRAR S,RELEKAR KJ.Epithelial thickness profile changes following small incision refractive lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia and myopic astigmatism[J].J Refract Surg,2016,32(7):473-478.

相似文献/References:

[1]计垣.近视的分子遗传学研究进展[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(6):000.
[2]张卫霞 曾照年 唐秀侠 孙宏霞 李洪润.Zywave波前像差仪在近视屈光不正测量中的应用[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(7):000.
[3]闵红波 刘小红 花雷 韩文龙 储明慧 邵娟英.近视对OCT测量视网膜神经纤维层厚度的影响[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(12):000.
[4]刘太祥 李海祥 石容 王铮.ORK程序中两种切削模式治疗近视术后角膜像差变化及对视觉功能的影响[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(1):000.
[5]李福生 尹鸿芝 周跃华.飞秒激光制瓣负压吸引对视网膜神经纤维层厚度和神经节细胞复合体厚度的影响[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(1):000.
[6]董坤峰 张印博 张继玲 尹会苏 康焕君 申华.飞秒激光制瓣再次LASIK治疗LASIK术后近视的临床疗效观察[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(1):000.
[7]陈月芹 黄振平 薛春燕 葛轶睿.有晶状体眼虹膜固定型人工晶状体植入术后房角宽度的改变[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(6):000.
[8]王凌飞 杨瑞波 赵少贞.CACHET有晶状体眼人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量的临床评价[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(6):000.
[9]赵波.飞秒激光LASIK术中开放式冲洗与闭合式冲洗疗效的对比分析[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(7):000.
[10]许瑶 曾骏文.近视眼药物治疗研究进展[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(7):000.
[11]胡裕坤 李文静 高晓唯 董晶 郭云林.飞秒激光微小切口角膜基质透镜切除术治疗近视对角膜波前像差的影响[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(7):000.
[12]兰文 袁军 唐文建 李伟利. 飞秒激光辅助小切口基质透镜取出术的研究进展[J].眼科新进展,2014,34(1):091.
[13]胡裕坤 李文静 高晓唯 郭云林 董晶. Kappa角对飞秒激光角膜基质透镜切除术治疗近视的影响[J].眼科新进展,2014,34(2):168.
[14]李凯,王育良,张传伟,等.不同大小切口飞秒激光基质透镜切除术矫正近视术后角膜地形图对比研究[J].眼科新进展,2014,34(12):1137.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2014.0315]
 LI Kai,WANG Yu-Liang,ZHANG Chuan-Wei,et al.Effects of different incision sizes on Corne topography changes after femtosecond lenticule extraction surgery for myopia[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2014,34(11):1137.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2014.0315]
[15]张印博,康焕君,刘延东. 飞秒激光制作不同大小角膜瓣LASIK手术治疗近视的临床疗效分析[J].眼科新进展,2015,35(7):677.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0185]
 ZHANG Yin-Bo,KANG Huan-Jun,LIU Yan-Dong. FS-LASIK with small corneal flap versus big corneal flap for myopia[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2015,35(11):677.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0185]
[16]陶思思,王华,罗栋强,等. 飞秒激光制瓣LASIK治疗近视散光的疗效分析[J].眼科新进展,2015,35(8):772.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0212]
 TAO Si-Si,WANG Hua,LUO Dong-Qiang,et al. Curative effect analysis of femtosecond LASIK for myopic astigmatism[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2015,35(11):772.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0212]
[17]梅波,张卉卉,段丽,等.2.0mm小切口飞秒激光角膜基质透镜取出术与飞秒激光辅助的LASIK矫正近视的疗效比较[J].眼科新进展,2016,36(12):1133.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0302]
 MEI Bo,ZHANG Hui-Hui,DUAN Li,et al.Comparison of 2.0 mm small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser LASIK for myopia[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2016,36(11):1133.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0302]
[18]王萌萌,王晶晶,刘延东,等.不同FS-LASIK飞秒激光机制作的角膜瓣表面光滑度及对术中角膜瓣相关操作的影响[J].眼科新进展,2021,41(2):145.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0030]
 WANG Mengmeng,WANG Jingjing,LIU Yandong,et al.Surface smoothness of corneal flap made by different FS-LASIK femtosecond lasers and its effects on relevant operations[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2021,41(11):145.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0030]
[19]王萌萌,王晶晶,尹会,等.Ziemer LDV Z6 飞秒激光机制作角膜瓣的FS-LASIK 手术并发症处理和长期疗效评价[J].眼科新进展,2021,41(3):227.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0047]
 WANG Mengmeng,WANG Jingjing,YIN Hui,et al.Complication management and long-term efficacy evaluation of FS-LASIK using Ziemer LDV Z6 femtosecond laser[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2021,41(11):227.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0047]
[20]肖静,李娜,张蕊,等.对比分析阿玛仕1050RS自旋补偿FS-LASIK与SMILE矫正近视散光的临床疗效[J].眼科新进展,2022,42(7):542.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2022.0111]
 XIAO Jing,LI Na,ZHANG Rui,et al.Comparison of clinical efficacy between AMARIS 1050RS cyclotorsion-compensation femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and small incision lenticule extraction for myopic astigmatism[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2022,42(11):542.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2022.0111]

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-11-01