[1]肖静,李娜,张蕊,等.对比分析阿玛仕1050RS自旋补偿FS-LASIK与SMILE矫正近视散光的临床疗效[J].眼科新进展,2022,42(7):542-545.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2022.0111]
　XIAO Jing,LI Na,ZHANG Rui,et al.Comparison of clinical efficacy between AMARIS 1050RS cyclotorsion-compensation femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and small incision lenticule extraction for myopic astigmatism[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2022,42(7):542-545.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2022.0111]
点击复制

对比分析阿玛仕1050RS自旋补偿FS-LASIK与SMILE矫正近视散光的临床疗效/HTML
分享到：

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
42卷
期数:
2022年7期
页码:
542-545
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2022-07-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of clinical efficacy between AMARIS 1050RS cyclotorsion-compensation femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and small incision lenticule extraction for myopic astigmatism
作者:
肖静; 李娜; 张蕊; 杜改萍
100000　北京市，北京华德眼科医院屈光中心(肖静，李娜，张蕊）；266000　山东省青岛市，解放军海军第971医院眼科（杜改萍）
Author(s):
XIAO Jing1; LI Na1; ZHANG Rui1; DU Gaiping2
1.Department of Ophthalmology,Refractive Centers of Beijing Huade Opthalmic Hospital,Beijing 100000，China
2.Department of Ophthalmology,the PLA No.971 Hospital of Navy,Qingdao 266000,Shandong Province，China
关键词:
近视; 散光; 屈光手术; 眼球自旋补偿; 飞秒激光
Keywords:
myopia;  astigmatism;  refractive surgery;  cyclotorsion-compensation;  femtosecond laser
分类号:
R779.63
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2022.0111
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　对比分析阿玛仕1050RS自旋补偿飞秒激光制瓣准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术（FS-LASIK）与飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术（SMILE）矫正近视散光的临床疗效。方法　选取2021年1月至9月在我院行近视屈光手术的患者113 例（203眼）作为研究对象。按手术方式不同将患者分为FS-LASIK组56例（103眼，行自旋补偿FS-LASIK）和SMILE组 57例（100眼，行SMILE）。根据术前散光度将两组患者进一步分为低度散光组（散光度<-2.0 D）和高度散光组（散光度≥-2.0 D）。低度散光组：FS-LASIK组患者38例（70眼），SMILE组患者40例（70眼）；高度散光组：FS-LASIK组患者18例（33眼），SMILE组患者17例（30眼）。分别于术前和术后6个月常规检查患者裸眼视力（UCVA）、最佳矫正视力（BCVA)、球镜度、柱镜度并记录与分析。结果　两组患者术前基线资料，年龄、性别构成、球镜度、柱镜度、BCVA、角膜厚度及角膜曲率比较差异均无统计学意义（均为P>0.05)。低度散光组：术后SMILE组和FS-LASIK组患者UCVA达到或超过0.8的患眼比例均为100.0%；UCVA达到或超过1.0的患眼比例，SMILE组为90.0%，FS-LASIK组为93.2%，差异均无统计学意义（均为P>0.05）。高度散光组：术后患者UCVA达到或超过0.8的患眼比例，SMILE组为83.3%，FS-LASIK组为87.9%，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；UCVA达到或超过1.0的患眼比例，SMILE组为80.0%，FS-LASIK组为84.9%，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。低度散光组： 术后SMILE组患眼柱镜度为(-0.39±0.22)D，FS-LASIK组为(-0.32±0.21)D，差异无统计学意义（t=1.249,P=0.147）；高度散光组：术后SMILE组患眼柱镜度为(-0.65±0.33)D，FS-LASIK组为(-0.42±0.28)D，SMILE组高于FS-LASIK组，差异有统计学意义（t=2.583，P=0.014）。进一步比较柱镜度矫正的可预测性：低度散光组中FS-LASIK组患眼实际矫正柱镜度与预期矫正柱镜度差值为(-0.14±0.12）D，SMILE组为(-0.18±0.16）D，两组差异无统计学意义（t=0.700，P=0.472）；高度散光组中FS-LASIK组患眼实际矫正柱镜度与预期矫正柱镜度差值［(-0.31±0.17)D］低于SMILE组［(-0.46±0.24）D］，两组差异有统计学意义（t=2.117，P=0.020)。结论　阿玛仕1050RS自旋补偿FS-LASIK对于近视散光的矫正效果优于SMILE。≥-2.0 D的高度散光患者选择自旋补偿的FS-LASIK矫治效果较好。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the clinical effect of AMARIS 1050RS cyclotorsion-compensation femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopic astigmatism. Methods　A total of 113 patients (203 eyes) who underwent refractive surgery in our hospital from January to September 2021 were enrolled in this study. According to the surgical method, these patients were divided into the FS-LASIK group (56 patients, 103 eyes, with cyclotorsion-compensation FS-LASIK) and the SMILE group (57 patients, 100 eyes, with SMILE). According to the preoperative astigmatism, these patients were further divided into the low astigmatism group (astigmatism <-2.0 D) and the high astigmatism group (astigmatism ≥-2.0 D). The low astigmatism group included 38 patients (70 eyes) from the FS-LASIK group and 40 patients (70 eyes) from the SMILE group. The high astigmatism group included 18 patients (33 eyes) from the FS-LASIK group and 17 patients (30 eyes) from the SMILE group. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), sphere, and cylinder were checked and analyzed before and 6 months after operation. Results　There were no significant differences in preoperative baseline data such as age, gender composition, sphere, cylinder, BCVA, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature between the FS-LASIK group and the SMILE group (all P>0.05). In the low astigmatism group, 100.0% of eyes had the UCVA better than or equal to 0.8 after operation, and the percentage of eyes with postoperative UCVA≥1.0 was 90.0% in the SMILE group and 93.2% in the FS-LASIK group (P>0.05). In the high astigmatism group, the percentage of eyes with postoperative UCVA≥0.8 was 83.3% in the SMILE group and 87.9% in the FS-LASIK group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05); the percentage of eyes with postoperative UCVA≥1.0 was 80.0% in the SMILE group and 84.9% in the FS-LASIK group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Among the patients with preoperative astigmatism <-2.0 D, the postoperative cylinder was (-0.39±0.22) D in the SMILE group and (-0.32±0.21) D in the FS-LASIK group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=1.249, P=0.147). Among the patients with preoperative astigmatism ≥-2.0 D, the postoperative cylinder was (-0.65±0.33) D in the SMILE group and (-0.42±0.28) D in the FS-LASIK group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t=2.583, P=0.014). Among the patients with preoperative astigmatism <-2.0 D, the mean deviation of the actual and expected cylinder correction was (-0.14±0.12) D in the FS-LASIK group and (-0.18±0.16) D in the SMILE group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.700, P=0.472). Among the patients with preoperative astigmatism ≥-2.0 D, the mean deviation of the actual and expected cylinder correction was significantly higher in the SMILE group ［(-0.46±0.24) D］ than that in the FS-LASIK group ［(-0.31±0.17) D］ (t=2.117, P=0.020). Conclusion　AMARIS 1050RS cyclotorsion-compensation FS-LASIK is better than SMILE in astigmatism correction. The patients with astigmatism ≥-2.0 D improve better after the cyclotorsion-compensation FS-LASIK.

参考文献/References:

［1］　ARBA-MOSQUERA S,MERAYO-LLOVES J,DE O D.Clinical effects of pure cyclotorsional errors during refractive surgery［J］.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2008,49(11):4828-4836.
［2］　ASLANIDES I M,TOLIOU G,PADRONI S,ARBA M S,KOLLI S.The effect of static cyclotorsion compensation on refractive and visual outcomes using the Schwind Amaris laser platform for the correction of high astigmatism Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis in high mixed astigmatism with optimized,fast-repetition and cyclotorsion control excimer laser［J］.Cont Lens Anterior Eye,2011,34(3):114-120.
［3］　罗珍,齐文娟,罗琰,刘玲,樊飞红,李沁,等.手动旋转补偿法在SMILE手术矫正近视散光中的应用［J］.眼科新进展,2022,42(1):44-48.
LUO Z,QI W J,LUO Y,LIU L,FAN F H,LI Q,et al.Application of manual cyclotorsion compensation in myopic astigmatism correction during small incision lenticule extraction［J］.Rec Adv Ophthalmol,2022,42(1):44-48.
［4］　陈世豪,文佩,瞿佳,胡晓建,张佳.FS-LASIK手术中动态眼球旋转的相关影响因素［J］.中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2018,20(4):198-203.
CHEN S H,WEN P,QU J,HU X J,ZHANG J.Factors that affect the dynamic cyclotorsion component during femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis［J］.Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2018,20(4):198-203.
［5］　ALIO J L,PACHKORIA K,EL A A,PLAZA-PUCHE A B.Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis in high mixed astigmatism with optimized,fast-repetition and cyclotorsion control excimer laser［J］.Am J Ophthalmol,2013,155(5):829-836.
［6］　LUCENA A R,MOTA J A,LUCENA D R,FERREIRA S L,ANDRADE N L.Cyclotorsion measurement in laser refractive surgery［J］.Arq Bras Oftalmol,2013,76(6):339-340.
［7］　MOSHIRFAR M,HOGGAN R N,MUTHAPPAN V.Angle kappa and its importance in refractive surgery［J］.Oman J Ophthalmol,2013,6(3):151-158.
［8］　QIAN Y,HUANG J,CHU R,ZHAO J,LI M,ZHOU X,et al.Influence of intraocular astigmatism on the correction of myopic astigmatism by femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg,2015,41(5):1057-1064.
［9］　IVARSEN A,GYLDENKERNE A,HJORTDAL J.Correction of astigmatism with small-incision lenticule extraction:Impact of against-the-rule and with-the-rule astigmatism［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg,2018,44(9):1066-1072.
［10］　NEUHANN I M,BA L G,BAUER M,HASSEL J M,HILGER A,NEUHANN T F.Static and dynamic rotational eye tracking during LASIK treatment of myopic astigmatism with the zyoptix laser platform and advanced control eye tracker［J］.J Refract Surg,2010,26(1):17-27.
［11］　FAHD D C,JABBOUR E,FAHED C D.Static cyclotorsion measurements using the Schwind Amaris laser［J］.Arq Bras Oftalmol,2014,77(3):159-163.
［12］　ARBELAEZ M C,VIDAL C,ARBA M S.Excimer laser correction of moderate to high astigmatism with a non-wavefrontguided aberration-free ablation profile:six-month results［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg,2009,35(10):1789-1798.
［13］　ALIO D L,BARRIO J L,VARGAS V,AL S O,ALIO J L.Small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)in the correction of myopic astigmatism:outcomes and limitations-an update［J］.Eye Vis (Lond),2018,4(5):1-8.
［14］　GANESH S,BRAR S,PAWAR A.Results of intraoperative manual cyclotorsion compensation for myopic astigmatism in patients undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)［J］.J Refract Surg,2017,33(8):506-512.
［15］　PEDERSEN I B,IVARSEN A,HJORTDAL J.Changes in astigmatism,densitometry, and aberrations after SMILE for low to high myopic astigmatism:a 12-Month prospective study［J］.J Refract Surg,2017,33(1):11-17.
［16］　KATAOKA T,NISHIDA T,MURATA A,ITO M,ISOGAI N,HORAI R,et al.Control-matched comparison of refractive and visual outcomes between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK［J］.Clin Ophthalmol,2018,12(12):865-873.
［17］　EL-MAYAH E,ANIS M,SALEM M,PINERO D,HOSNY M.Comparison between Q-Adjusted LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism［J］.Eye Contact Lens,2018,44 (Suppl 2):S426-S432.
［18］　KHALIFA M A,GHONEIM A M,SHAHEEN M S,PIERO D P.Vector analysis of astigmatic changes after small-incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg,2017,43(6):819-824.
［19］　GANESH S,BRAR S,PAWAR A.Matched population comparison of visual outcomes and patient satisfaction between 3 modalities for the correction of low to moderate myopic astigmatism［J］.Clin Ophthalmol,2017,11:1253-1263.
［20］　PIETIL J,HUHTALA A,MKINEN P,NTTINEN J,RAJALA T,SALMENHAARA K,et al.Uncorrected visual acuity,postoperative astigmatism,and dry eye symptoms are major determinants of patient satisfaction:a comparative,real-life study of femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis and small incision lenticule extraction for myopia［J］.Clin Ophthalmol,2018,12(12):1741-1755.
［21］　CHAN T Y,NG A L,CHENG G P,WANG Z,YE C,WOO V C,et al.Vector analysis of astigmatic correction after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond-assisted LASIK for low to moderate myopic astigmatism［J］.Br J Ophthalmol,2016,100 (4):553-559.

相似文献/References:

[1]计垣.近视的分子遗传学研究进展[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(6):000.
[2]张卫霞 曾照年 唐秀侠 孙宏霞 李洪润.Zywave波前像差仪在近视屈光不正测量中的应用[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(7):000.
[3]闵红波 刘小红 花雷 韩文龙 储明慧 邵娟英.近视对OCT测量视网膜神经纤维层厚度的影响[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(12):000.
[4]吴岩 于靖 朱玮 李艳红 巴俊 栗莉 赵莼.2011年上海市闸北区和田路小学学生散光状态及相关因素分析[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(1):000.
[5]徐冰 董宁 肖林 徐景美 褚利群 马骁.Toric人工晶状体植入术与球面人工晶状体植入联合周边角膜缘松解术矫正散光的对比研究[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(1):000.
[6]刘太祥 李海祥 石容 王铮.ORK程序中两种切削模式治疗近视术后角膜像差变化及对视觉功能的影响[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(1):000.
[7]揭黎明 王骞 郑林 叶向彧.实时虹膜识别技术在波前引导飞秒激光制瓣LASIK中的应用[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(2):000.
[8]陈月芹 黄振平 薛春燕 葛轶睿.有晶状体眼虹膜固定型人工晶状体植入术后房角宽度的改变[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(6):000.
[9]王凌飞 杨瑞波 赵少贞.CACHET有晶状体眼人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量的临床评价[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(6):000.
[10]邵毅 高桂平 余瑶 邹文进 裴重刚 李凯军 涂萍 杨继玲 陈素芳.带状疱疹病毒性角膜炎非活动期眼表改变的临床研究[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(7):000.
[11]陶思思,王华,罗栋强,等. 飞秒激光制瓣LASIK治疗近视散光的疗效分析[J].眼科新进展,2015,35(8):772.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0212]
　TAO Si-Si,WANG Hua,LUO Dong-Qiang,et al. Curative effect analysis of femtosecond LASIK for myopic astigmatism[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2015,35(7):772.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0212]
[12]杜改萍,郭惠玲,黄一飞,等.Toric有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体矫正高度近视散光的临床观察[J].眼科新进展,2016,36(1):047.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0013]
　DU Gai-Ping,GUO Hui-Ling,HUANG Yi-Fei,et al.Toric implantable collamer lens implantation for high myopic astigmatism[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2016,36(7):047.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0013]
[13]罗珍,齐文娟,罗琰,等.手动旋转补偿法在SMILE手术矫正近视散光中的应用[J].眼科新进展,2022,42(1):044.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2022.0010]
　LUO Zhen,QI Wenjuan,LUO Yan,et al.Application of manual cyclotorsion compensation in myopic astigmatism correction during small incision lenticule extraction[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2022,42(7):044.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2022.0010]
[14]田彩霞,王雁,赵新恒,等.SMILE切口大小对患者术后散光及高阶像差的影响[J].眼科新进展,2023,43(9):717.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2023.0144]
　TIAN Caixia,WANG Yan,ZHAO Xinheng,et al.Effect of the incision size on astigmatism and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2023,43(7):717.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2023.0144]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
青岛市医药卫生科研计划（编号：2021-WJZD240）
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-07-05