[1]梅波,张卉卉,周维,等.医疗相关工作人员飞秒激光辅助的LASIK术后生活质量调查[J].眼科新进展,2016,36(5):443-446.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0118]
 MEI Bo,ZHANG Hui-Hui,ZHOU Wei,et al.A survey about life quality after FS-LASIK in medical workers[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2016,36(5):443-446.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0118]
点击复制

医疗相关工作人员飞秒激光辅助的LASIK术后生活质量调查
分享到:

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2016年5期
页码:
443-446
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2016-05-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
A survey about life quality after FS-LASIK in medical workers
作者:
梅波张卉卉周维赵春焕郑坤坤易湘龙
830054 新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市,新疆医科大学第一附属医院眼科
Author(s):
MEI Bo ZHANG Hui-HuiZHOU Wei ZHAO Chun-Huan ZHENG Kun-Kun YI Xiang-Long
Department of Ophthalmology ,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Wulumuqi 830054,Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China
关键词:
飞秒激光LASIK医护人员生活质量
Keywords:
femtosecond laser LASIK medical staff life quality
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0118
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 调查飞秒激光辅助的LASIK(femtosecondlaserLASIK,FS-LASIK)手术对行近视手术的医疗相关工作人员生活质量及医疗活动的影响。方法 对35例(70眼)医疗相关工作人员(包含医师、护士、技师)行FS-LASIK,记录术前及术后1d、1周、1个月、3个月的裸眼视力、最佳矫正视力与等效球镜度数,应用屈光矫正者生命质量量表对术前及术后3个月患者的生活质量进行打分,并采取量表的方式进行手术前后屈光状态对医疗活动影响与对手术综合满意度的评价。结果 35例(70眼)患者术后1d、1周、1个月及3个月,裸眼视力分别为1.11±0.26、1.18±0.23、1.24±0.22、1.23±0.23;等效球镜度数分别为(0.45±0.37)D、(0.34±0.41)D、(-0.17±0.57)D、(-0.28±0.55)D。术后3个月的随访过程中,无一例出现最佳矫正视力较术前降低。35例医护人员术前生活质量评分为(38.28±2.15)分,术后为(44.13±1.06)分,差异具有统计学意义(t=-13.85,P=0.00)。量表20个条目中,共有12个条目术前术后得分比较,差异均有统计学意义。在针对屈光状态对医疗活动影响的评价中,术前及术后3条指标得分对比,差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05)。对手术综合满意度评价中,最终得分为(9.62±1.05)分。结论 医疗工作相关人员行FS-LASIK术后生活质量较术前有所提高,减少了屈光不正对医疗活动带来的不便,患者对手术结果有较高的满意度。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effects of femtosecond laser LASIK ( FS-LASIK) on life quality and medical activities of medical related staff. Methods Uncorrected visual acuity ( UCVA) , best corrected visual acuity ( BCVA) , spherical equivalent(SE) were measured preoperatively and I day, I week, I month and 3 months postoperatively in 35 medical staffs ( including doctor , nurse and medical technician ) who underwent FS-LASIK. Chinese version of the Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction ( QIRC ) Questionnarre was used to measure the life quality before and 3 months after FS-LASIK. At the same time,the patient ’ s satisfaction and impact for medical activities were surveyed before and after FS-LASIK. Results At I day , I week, I month .3 months after surgery , the uncorrected visual acuity were l. 11 + 0. 26. 1. 18 + 0. 23 , 1. 24 + 0. 22 and l. 23 + 0. 23 , respectively , the spherical equivalent were ( 0. 45 + 0. 37) D, (0. 34 + 0. 41 D. ( - 0. 17 + 0. 57 ) D and ( - 0. 28 +0. 55 ) D. No best corrected visual acuity decreased after 3 month follow-up postoperatively. The overall life quality score for medical staffs improve from 38. 28 +2. 15 t0 44. 13 + 1. 06 ( t = - 13. 85 ,P = 0. 00) after FS-LASIK. In this questionnaire.a total of 12 items had significant differences in score changes before and after surgery. For the change in impact of refractive status for medical activities , all 3 items had significant differences rn score changes before and after surgery ( P < 0. 05 ) . The final patient ’ s satisfaction score was 9. 62 + 1. 05. Conclusion The life quality are significant improved in the majority of medical worker patients after FS-LASIK,the influences of refractive status for medical activities are reduced, and the patients have the well satisfaction.

相似文献/References:

[1]李雪 赵延军 张丽 胡琦 王珂萌.近视眼患者LASIK和LASEK术后角膜后表面变化的比较研究[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(6):000.
[2]姜洋 李莹 王忠海 罗岩 金玉梅.小牛血去蛋白提取物眼用凝胶对LASIK 术后角膜修复及干眼的疗效观察[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(7):000.
[3]赵武校 蓝方方 刘伟民 黄建忠 罗武强 李志超.LASIK术后高眼压患者眼压与屈光状态之间变化关系的研究[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(11):000.
[4]刘太祥 李海祥 石容 王铮.ORK程序中两种切削模式治疗近视术后角膜像差变化及对视觉功能的影响[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(1):000.
[5]李福生 尹鸿芝 周跃华.飞秒激光制瓣负压吸引对视网膜神经纤维层厚度和神经节细胞复合体厚度的影响[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(1):000.
[6]胡裕坤 李文静 高晓唯 董晶 郭云林.飞秒激光微小切口角膜基质透镜切除术治疗近视对角膜波前像差的影响[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(7):000.
[7]范罕英 张玙 杜之渝.飞秒激光与机械刀制瓣LASIK术后视觉质量的研究进展[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(7):000.
[8]张婉婷 高芬 皮百木 王磊 周青霞 穆东伟.不同波前像差引导的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术术后暗环境视力的对比研究[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(9):000.
[9]赵波.Intralase飞秒激光术中掀瓣困难的原因及处理[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(9):000.
[10]杜献芳 刘洛如 史芳荣.飞秒激光LASIK与LASEK矫正近视术后角膜后表面变化对比研究[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(9):000.
[11]董坤峰 张印博 张继玲 尹会苏 康焕君 申华.飞秒激光制瓣再次LASIK治疗LASIK术后近视的临床疗效观察[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(1):000.
[12]赵波.飞秒激光LASIK术中开放式冲洗与闭合式冲洗疗效的对比分析[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(7):000.
[13]李晶,魏升升,万雅群,等. 波前像差引导飞秒激光制瓣LASIK术后不同范围角膜高阶像差的变化[J].眼科新进展,2014,34(7):658.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2014.0180]
[14]屠永芳,杜献芳,张红霞,等. 飞秒激光小切口透镜切除术与飞秒LASIK术后角膜后表面高度变化[J].眼科新进展,2015,35(7):679.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0186]
 TU Yong-Fang,DU Xian-Fang,ZHANG Hong-Xia,et al. Postoperative changes of posterior corneal surface height after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond LASIK[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2015,35(5):679.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0186]
[15]朱冉,程蕾,龙克利,等.飞秒激光辅助的LASIK治疗高度近视术后高阶像差和角膜后表面高度的变化[J].眼科新进展,2016,36(8):757.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0202]
 ZHU Ran,CHENG Lei,LONG Ke-Li,et al.Changes of high order aberration and posterior corneal surface height after femtosecond laser assisted LASIK for high myopia[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2016,36(5):757.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0202]
[16]梅波,张卉卉,段丽,等.2.0mm小切口飞秒激光角膜基质透镜取出术与飞秒激光辅助的LASIK矫正近视的疗效比较[J].眼科新进展,2016,36(12):1133.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0302]
 MEI Bo,ZHANG Hui-Hui,DUAN Li,et al.Comparison of 2.0 mm small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser LASIK for myopia[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2016,36(5):1133.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0302]
[17]赵志国,楚媛,李忠庆,等.LASIK术后再次手术时应用飞秒激光再制瓣与用原瓣的比较研究[J].眼科新进展,2016,36(12):1168.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0311]
 ZHAO Zhi-Guo,CHU Yuan,LI Zhong-Qing,et al.Comparative study between femtosecond laser flap and opening original flap in retreatment of after-LASIK myopia[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2016,36(5):1168.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0311]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金资助(编号:81260150);2012年高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(编号:20126517120004);新疆医科大学第一附属医院2012青年科研专项基金(编号:2012QN08)
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-05-04