[1]张沛霖,郭露,向小红,等.飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术后角膜生物力学变化的影响因素分析[J].眼科新进展,2023,43(11):897-902.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2023.0180]
　ZHANG Peilin,GUO Lu,XIANG Xiaohong,et al.Changes in corneal biomechanical properties and their influencing factors after small incision lenticule extraction[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2023,43(11):897-902.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2023.0180]
点击复制

飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术后角膜生物力学变化的影响因素分析/HTML
分享到：

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
43卷
期数:
2023年11期
页码:
897-902
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2023-11-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Changes in corneal biomechanical properties and their influencing factors after small incision lenticule extraction
作者:
张沛霖; 郭露; 向小红; 孔祥梅; 黄朝霞; 吕红彬
646000　四川省泸州市，西南医科大学附属医院眼科
Author(s):
ZHANG Peilin; GUO Lu; XIANG Xiaohong; KONG Xiangmei; HUANG Zhaoxia; L? Hongbin
Department of Ophthalmology,the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University,Luzhou 646000,Sichuan Province,China
关键词:
飞秒激光小切口基质透镜取出术; 屈光不正; 角膜生物力学特性; Corvis ST
Keywords:
small incision lenticule extraction;  refractive errors;  corneal biomechanical properties;  Corvis ST
分类号:
R778.1
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2023.0180
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　探讨飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(SMILE)术后角膜生物力学特性变化相关的影响因素。
方法　回顾性病例对照研究。选取2020年7月至2022年8月于西南医科大学附属医院眼科进行SMILE手术的患者108例203眼，应用Corvis ST测量所有研究对象硬度参数A1(SPA1)、综合半径(IR)、水平方向Ambrósio相关厚度(ARTh)、1 mm范围内形变幅度比(DAR/1 mm)、2 mm范围内形变幅度比(DAR/2 mm)和最大形变幅度(DA)，并应用统计学方法分析角膜生物力学参数术后3个月与术前的改变量与年龄、球镜度、柱镜度、等效球镜度(SE)、眼轴长度(AL)、眼压(IOP)、中央角膜厚度(CCT)、残余基质厚度(RST)、RST/CCT、角膜帽厚度（CAP）/CCT、切削厚度和组织改变百分比(PTA)之间的相关性。
结果　经相关性分析，PTA与ΔDAR/1 mm(r=0.302，P<0.001)(Δ指术后3个月与术前的改变量)、ΔDAR/2 mm(r=0.355，P<0.001)、ΔARTh(r=0.470，P<0.001)、ΔIR(r=0.501，P<0.001)、ΔSPA1(r=0.318，P=0.016)均呈显著正相关；RST与ΔDAR/1 mm(r=-0.202，P=0.004)、ΔDAR/2 mm(r=-0.365，P<0.001)、ΔARTh(r=-0.244，P<0.001)、ΔIR(r=-0.402，P<0.001)、ΔSPA1(r=-0.169，P=0.016)均呈显著负相关；CAP/CCT与ΔARTh(r=-0.339，P<0.001)、ΔIR(r=-0.141，P=0.044)、ΔSPA1(r=-0.243，P<0.001)均呈显著负相关；AL与ΔARTh(r=0.434，P<0.001)、ΔIR(r=0.245，P=0.001)、ΔSPA1(r= 0.336，P<0.001)均呈显著正相关。PTA与ΔIR的6阶拟合曲线提示，当PTA>26%时曲线斜率明显增大。
结论　PTA越小、RST越大、CAP/CCT越大，SMILE术后安全性越高，且当PTA>26%时，较小的切削厚度占比增加即可造成SMILE术后较大的角膜生物力学改变。
Abstract:
Objective　To analyze the variations of corneal biomechanical properties after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and their influencing factors.
Methods　In this retrospective case-control study, 108 patients (203 eyes) who received SMILE surgery in the Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, from July 2020 to August 2022, were selected. The stiffness parameter at the first applanation (SPA1), integrated radius (IR), Ambrósio’s relational thickness to the horizontal profile (ARTh), deformation amplitude ratio at 1 mm (DAR/1 mm), deformation amplitude ratio at 2 mm (DAR/2 mm), and the maximum deformation amplitude (DA) were measured with Corvis ST. Changes in corneal biomechanical parameters three months after surgery were analyzed using the statistical method, and their correlations with age, spherical power, cylindrical power, spherical equivalent (SE), axial length (AL), intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), residual stromal thickness (RST), RST/CCT, cap thickness (CAP)/CCT, cutting thickness and percent tissue altered (PTA) were discussed.
Results　Correlation analysis showed that PTA was positively correlated with ΔDAR/1 mm (r=0.302, P<0.001) (Δ refers to the change in parameters after SMILE in three months), ΔDAR/2 mm (r=0.355, P<0.001), ΔARTh (r=0.470, P<0.001), ΔIR (r=0.501, P<0.001), and ΔSPA1 (r=0.318, P=0.016); RST was negatively correlated with ΔDAR/1 mm (r=-0.202, P=0.004), ΔDAR/2 mm (r=-0.365, P<0.001), ΔARTh (r=-0.244, P<0.001), ΔIR (r=-0.402, P<0.001), and ΔSPA1 (r=-0.169, P=0.016); CAP/CCT was negatively correlated with ΔARTh (r=-0.339, P<0.001), ΔIR (r=-0.141, P=0.044), and ΔSPA1 (r=-0.243, P<0.001); AL was positively correlated with ΔARTh (r=0.434, P<0.001), ΔIR (r=0.245, P=0.001), and ΔSPA1 (r=0.336, P<0.001). The 6-order fitting curve about PTA and ΔIR indicated that the curve slope increased significantly when PTA exceeded 26%.
Conclusion　Lower PTA and larger RST and CAP/CCT mean higher safety after SMILE. When PTA exceeds 26%, a mild increase in the cutting thickness ratio may cause significant variations of corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE.

参考文献/References:

［1］　CHICHE A,TRINH L,BAUDOUIN C,DENOYER A.Small incision lenticule extraction among the corneal refractive surgeries in 2018 (French translation of the article)［J］.J Fr Ophtalmol,2018,41(7):650-658.
［2］　ROBERTS C J,Dupps W J,Jr.Biomechanics of corneal ectasia and biomechanical treatments［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg,2014,40(6):991-998.
［3］　AMBRSIO R,Jr,LOPES B T,FARIA-CORREIA F,SALOMO M Q,BHREN J,ROBERTS C J,et al.Integration of Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing ectasia detection［J］.J Refract Surg,2017,33(7):434-443.
［4］　KATARIA P,PADMANABHAN P,GOPALAKRISHNAN A,PADMANABAN V,MAHADIK S,AMBRSIO R,Jr.Accuracy of Scheimpflug-derived corneal biomechanical and tomographic indices for detecting subclinical and mild keratectasia in a South Asian population［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg,2019,45(3):328-336.
［5］　YANG K,XU L,FAN Q,ZHAO D,REN S.Repeatability and comparison of new Corvis ST parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes［J］.Sci Rep,2019,9:15379.
［6］　SONG P,YANG K,LI P,LIU Y,LIANG D,REN S,et al.Assessment of corneal pachymetry distribution and morphologic changes in subclinical keratoconus with normal biomechanics［J］.Biomed Res Int,2019,2019:1748579.
［7］　KIM T H,LEE D,LEE H I.The safety of 250 microm residual stromal bed in preventing keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)［J］.J Korean Med Sci,2007,22(1):142-145.
［8］　GAVRILOV J C,ATIA R,BORDERIE V,LAROCHE L,BOUHERAOUA N.Unilateral corneal ectasia after small-incision lenticule extraction in a 43-year-old patient［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg,2018,44(3):403-406.
［9］　RANDLEMAN J B,TRATTLER W B,STULTING R D.Validation of the ectasia risk score system for preoperative laser in situ keratomileusis screening［J］.Am J Ophthalmol,2008,145(5):813-818.
［10］　SANTHIAGO M R,SMADJA D,GOMES B F,MELLO G R,MONTEIRO M L,WILSON S E,et al.Association between the percent tissue altered and post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia in eyes with normal preoperative topography［J］.Am J Ophthalmol,2014,158(1):87-95.
［11］　SANTHIAGO M R,SMADJA D,WILSON S E,KRUEGER R R,MONTEIRO M L R,RANDLEMAN J B.Role of percent tissue altered on ectasia after LASIK in eyes with suspicious topography［J］.J Refract Surg,2015,31(4):258-265.
［12］　BRENNER L F,ALI J L,VEGA-ESTRADA A,BAVIERA J,BELTRN J,COBO-SORIANO R.Clinical grading of post-LASIK ectasia related to visual limitation and predictive factors for vision loss［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg,2012,38(10):1817-1826.
［13］　ABAHUSSIN M,HAYES S,EDELHAUSER H,DAWSON D G,MEEK K M.A microscopy study of the structural features of post-LASIK human corneas［J］.PLoS One,2013,8(5):e63268.
［14］　HE S,LUO Y,YE Y,CHEN P,LIU C,LEI L,et al.A comparative and prospective study of corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK performed on the contralateral eyes of high myopia patients［J］.Ann Transl Med,2022,10(13):730.
［15］　XIN Y,LOPES B T,WANG J,WU J,ZHU M,JIANG M,et al.Biomechanical effects of tPRK,FS-LASIK,and SMILE on the cornea［J］.Front Bioeng Biotechnol,2022,10:834270.
［16］　KANELLOPOULOS A J.Comparison of corneal biomechanics after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction compared to LASIK:an ex vivo study［J］.Clin Ophthalmol,2018,12:237-245.
［17］　WANG J,LOPES B T,LI H,VINCIGUERRA R,CAO S,WU S,et al.Unintended changes in ocular biometric parameters during a 6-month follow-up period after FS-LASIK and SMILE［J］.Eye Vis,2021,8(1):9.
［18］　KHAMAR P,SHETTY R,VAISHNAV R,FRANCIS M,NUIJTS R M M A,SINHA ROY A.Biomechanics of LASIK flap and SMILE cap:a prospective,clinical study［J］.J Refract Surg,2019,35(5):324-332.
［19］　LIU J,WANG Y,ZOU H,LI M.Relation between corneal biomechanical alteration after small incision lenticule extraction and intraoperative cutting thickness［J］.Chin J Ophthalmol,2021,57(2):104-112.
［20］　HON Y,LAM A K C.Corneal deformation measurement using Scheimpflug noncontact tonometry［J］.Optom Vis Sci,2013,90(1):e1-e8.
［21］　黄云丽,王雁,窦瑞,金善博,刘凌佳,李华,等.SMILE术后角膜形变与角膜生物力学变化的研究［J］.中华眼科杂志,2017,53(1):11-17.
HUANG Y L,WANG Y,DOU R,JIN S B,LIU L J,LI H,et al.Analysis on corneal deformation and corneal biomechanical changes after small incision lenticule extraction［J］.Chin J Ophthalmol,2017,53(1):11-17.
［22］　中华医学会眼科学分会眼视光学组.我国飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出手术规范专家共识(2016年)［J］.中华眼科杂志,2016,52(1):15-21.
Ophthalmology Group,Society of Ophthalmology,Chinese Medical Association.Expert consensus on the specification of femtosecond laser small incision corneal stromal lens removal in China (2016)［J］.Chin J Ophthalmol,2016,52(1):15-21.
［23］　EL-MASSRY A A E K,GOWEIDA M B B,SHAMA A E S,ELKHAWAGA M H E,ABDALLA M F.Contralateral eye comparison between femtosecond small incision intrastromal lenticule extraction at depths of 100 and 160 μm［J］.Cornea,2015,34(10):1272-1275.
［24］　GUIRAO A.Theoretical elastic response of the cornea to refractive surgery:risk factors for keratectasia［J］.J Refract Surg,2005,21(2):176-185.
［25］　ABDI P,FARSIANI A R,FALLAH TAFTI M R,LATIFI G,ABDI P.Effect of ocular biometric factors on corneal biomechanical properties［J］.Int Ophthalmol,2023,43(6):1877-1888.
［26］　MIKI A,MAEDA N,IKUNO Y,ASAI T,HARA C,NISHIDA K.Factors associated with corneal deformation responses measured with a dynamic scheimpflug analyzer［J］.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2017,58(1):538.
［27］　SEDAGHAT M R,MOMENI-MOGHADDAM H,AZIMI A,FAKHIMI Z,ZIAEI M,DANESH Z,et al.Corneal biomechanical properties in varying severities of myopia［J］.Front Bioeng Biotechnol,2021,8:595330.

相似文献/References:

[1]胡俊 李学喜 林巧雅 叶瑞珍 许敏.不同仪器测量角膜直径和角膜曲率的一致性评价[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(4):000.
[2]张卫霞 曾照年 唐秀侠 孙宏霞 李洪润.Zywave波前像差仪在近视屈光不正测量中的应用[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(7):000.
[3]刘冰 孙春华 赵堪兴.远视性屈光不正图像筛查结果分析[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(7):000.
[4]李珊珊 邹海东 黄馨慧 刘曦洋.上海市宝山区青春期学生双眼协动参数状况分析[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(6):000.
[5]彭鹏 刘金华.屈光不正矫正后视网膜成像大小改变的计算方法[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(10):000.
[6]高天.传统综合训练与智能化多维视觉训练对屈光不正性弱视的疗效对比及其影响因素研究[J].眼科新进展,2014,34(11):1059.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2014.0293]
　GAO Tian.Efficacy of traditional combination therapy and intelligent multi-dimensional training for ametropic amblyopia and its influencing factors[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2014,34(11):1059.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2014.0293]
[7]王磊,胡伟华,朱炎华,等.Epi-LASIK治疗白内障摘出联合人工晶状体植入术后屈光不正的疗效观察[J].眼科新进展,2014,34(11):1068.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2014.0296]
　WANG Lei,HU Wei-Hua,ZHU Yan-Hua,et al.Observation of Epi-LASIK for ametropia after cataract extraction and intraocular lens impl tation[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2014,34(11):1068.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2014.0296]
[8]王建勋,项道满,胡兰香,等. 超未成熟儿视网膜病变术后屈光状态分析[J].眼科新进展,2015,35(7):649.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0177]
　WANG Jian-Xun,XIANG Dao-Man,HU Lan-Xiang,et al. Refractive outcome of retinopathy of prematurity in extremely low birth weight infants after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2015,35(11):649.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0177]
[9]邵晓蕾,周秀珍,秦波.青少年屈光不正人群中脉络膜厚度的研究[J].眼科新进展,2015,35(10):968.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0264]
　SHAO Xiao-Lei,ZHOU Xiu-Zhen,QIN Bo.Analysis of choroidal thickness in juvenile ametropia[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2015,35(11):968.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0264]
[10]韦乐强.早产与足月产学龄前儿童视功能差异的研究[J].眼科新进展,2016,36(4):371.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0101]
　WEI Le-Qiang.Comparison of preschool children ’ s visual function between premature and partus matures in the same age[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2016,36(11):371.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0101]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
四川省科技厅科技计划资助项目(编号：2020JDKP0072)
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-11-05