[1]王梦华,姚佳,李秋明,等.内界膜剥除孔周按摩术与内界膜填塞术治疗较大孔径特发性黄斑裂孔的对比研究[J].眼科新进展,2021,41(11):1062-1066.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0223]
　WANG Menghua,YAO Jia,LI Qiuming.Internal limiting membrane peeling and parafoveal retinal massage versus internal limiting membrane transposition for idiopathic macular holes with larger diameter[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2021,41(11):1062-1066.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0223]
点击复制

内界膜剥除孔周按摩术与内界膜填塞术治疗较大孔径特发性黄斑裂孔的对比研究/HTML
分享到：

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
41卷
期数:
2021年11期
页码:
1062-1066
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2021-11-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Internal limiting membrane peeling and parafoveal retinal massage versus internal limiting membrane transposition for idiopathic macular holes with larger diameter
作者:
王梦华; 姚佳; 李秋明
450052　河南省郑州市，郑州大学第一附属医院眼科
Author(s):
WANG Menghua; YAO Jia; LI Qiuming
Department of Ophthalmology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University， Zhengzhou 450052，Henan Province，China
关键词:
特发性黄斑裂孔; 玻璃体切割术; 内界膜剥除; 按摩
Keywords:
idiopathic macular hole;  vitrectomy;  internal limiting membrane peeling;  massage
分类号:
R774
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0223
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　比较内界膜剥除孔周按摩术与内界膜填塞术治疗较大孔径特发性黄斑裂孔（IMH）患者的临床疗效。方法　回顾性分析2018年9月至2020年6月于本院收治的IMH患者49例（50眼），裂孔直径为405～698（536.98±73.93）μm；24例（25眼）患者行玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除孔周按摩术（A组）；25例（25眼）患者行玻璃体切割联合内界膜填塞术（B组）。术后1周、1 个月、3个月、6个月定期复查，观察并比较两组患者术眼视力、不同光学相干断层扫描（OCT）分型黄斑裂孔恢复情况、微视野及术后并发症情况。结果　术后1周，A组23眼、B组24眼黄斑裂孔闭合，裂孔闭合率分别为92%、96%，两组差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.355，P=0.552）。术后6个月OCT分型黄斑裂孔愈合形态：A组18眼（72%）、B组11眼（44%）为Ⅰ型愈合，两组差异有统计学意义（χ2=4.023，P=0.04）。术后1周、1个月、3个月、6个月，两组患者视力均较术前改善，差异均有统计学意义（均为P<0.01）；两组患者间比较，术后1周视力差异无统计学意义（t=-1.092，P>0.05），术后1个月、3个月、6个月视力差异均有统计学意义（均为P<0.05），A组患者视力恢复优于B组。两组患者黄斑8°视网膜平均光敏感度和黄斑中心凹2°固视率术后均较术前改善，差异均有统计学意义（均为P<0.01）；术后1个月、3个月、6个月，两组患者间差异均有统计学意义（均为P<0.05）。A组1眼术后1周出现高眼压，抗炎及降眼压治疗后恢复；其余术眼随访期间均未出现严重并发症。结论　孔径400~700 μm的IMH行内界膜剥除孔周按摩术的治疗效果优于内界膜填塞术，值得在临床上推广应用。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the clinical efficacy of internal limiting membrane peeling combined with parafoveal retinal massage and internal limiting membrane transposition to treat idiopathic macular holes (IMH) with larger diameter. Methods　This study was a retrospective study. A total of 49 IMH patients (50 eyes) with macular holes of 405-698 (536.98±73.93) μm admitted in the hospital from September 2018 to June 2020 were selected. Among them, 24 patients (25 eyes) underwent vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling and parafoveal retinal massage (group A), and 25 patients (25 eyes) underwent vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane transposition (group B). Regular follow-up examinations were performed at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery to compare the visual acuity, the recovery of macular holes by optical coherence tomography (OCT), the microscopic field, and the postoperative complications. Results　One week after surgery, the macular hole was closed in 23 eyes in group A and 24 eyes in group B. The hole closure rate was 92% and 96%, respectively, without statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.355, P=0.552). Six months after surgery, type I closure appeared in 18 eyes (72%) in group A and 11 eyes (44%) in group B based on OCT, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ2=4.023, P=0.04). Postoperative visual acuity improved in both groups compared with preoperative value, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.01). Except at 1 week (t=-1.092, P>0.05), the two groups showed statistically significant differences in visual acuity at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery (all P<0.05), and vision recovery in group A was better than that in group B. The retinal mean sensitivity (RMS) at 8° of the macula and the fixation rate at 2° of the macular fovea improved in both groups after surgery, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.01). Upon comparison between the two groups, there were statistically significant differences in RMS and fixation rate at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery (all P<0.05). Ocular hypertension appeared in 1 eye in group A at 1 week after surgery and recovered by anti-inflammatory and intraocular pressure-reducing therapy. No serious complications occurred in the rest of eyes during follow-up examinations. Conclusion　For 400-700 μm IMH, internal limiting membrane peeling combined with parafoveal retinal massage is more effective than internal limiting membrane transposition and can be widely used in clinical practice.

参考文献/References:

［1］　CHATZIRALLI I P,THEODOSSIADIS P G,STEEL D H W.Internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery; why,when,and how?［J］.Retina,2018,38(5):870-882.
［2］　FARIA M Y,FERREIRA N P,CRISTVAO D M,MANO S,SOUSA D C,GRILLO M M.Tomographic structural changes of retinal layers after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery［J］.Ophthalmic Res,2018,59(1):24-29.
［3］　BAE K,KANG S W,KIM J H,KIM S J,KIM J M,YOON J M.Extent of internal limiting membrane peeling and its impact on macular hole surgery outcomes:a randomized trial［J］.Am J Ophthalmol,2016,169:179-188.
［4］　CH’NG S W,PATTON N,AHMED M,IVANOVA T,BAUMANN C,CHARLES S,et al.The manchester large macular hole study:isit time to reclassify large macular holes?［J］.Am J Opthalmol,2018,195:36-42.
［5］　MICHALEWSKA Z,MICHALEWSKI J,CISIECKI S,ADELMAN R,NAWROCKI J.Correlation between foveal structure and visual outcome following macular hole surgery:a spectral optical coherence tomography study［J］.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2008,246(6):823-830.
［6］　GASS J D.Idiopathic senile macular hole.Its early stages and pathogenesis［J］.Arch Ophthalmol,1988,106(5):629-639.
［7］　DUKEER J S,KAISER P K,BINDER S,SMET M D D,GAUDRIC A,REICHEL E,et al.The international vitreomacurar traction study group classifcation of vitreomacurar adhesion,traction,and macular hole［J］.Ophthalmology,2013,120(12):2611-2619.
［8］　XU Q,LUAN J.Internal limiting membrane flap technique in macular hole surgery［J］.Int J Ophthalmol,2020,13(5):822-831.
［9］　WAKABAYASHI T，IKUNO Y，SHIRAKI N，MATSUMURA N,SAKAGUCHI H,NISHIDA K．Inverted internal limiting membrane insertion versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia:one-year study［J］.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2018,256(8):1387-1393.
［10］　KURIYAMA S,HAYASHI H,JINGAMI Y,KURAMOTO N,AKITA J,MATSUMOTO M.Efficacy of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for the treatment of macular hole in high myopia［J］.Am J Ophthalmol,2013,156(1):125-131.
［11］　EJSTRUP R,LA COUR M,HEEGAARD S,KIILGAARD J F.Toxicity profiles of subretinal indocyanine green,Brilliant Blue G,and triamcinolone acetonide:a comparative study［J］.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2012,250(5):669-677.
［12］　PARK J H,LEE S M,PARK S W,LEE J E,BYON L S.Comparative analysis of large macular hole surgery using an internal limiting membrane insertion versus inverted flap technique［J］.Br J Ophthalmol,2019,103(2):245-250.
［13］　BRINGMANN A,IANDIEV I,PANNICKE T,WURM A,HOLLBORN M,WIEDEMANN P,et al.Cellular signaling and factors involved in Müller cell gliosis:neuroprotective and detrimental effects［J］.Prog Retin Eye Res,2009,28(6):423-451.
［14］　CHEN S N,YANG C M.Inverted internal limiting membrane insertion for macular hole-associated retinal detachment in high myopia［J］.Am J Ophthalmol,2016,162:99-106.
［15］　KUMAR A,TINWALA S I,GOGIA V,SEHRA S V.Tapping of macular hole edges:the outcomes of a novel technique for large macular holes［J］.Asia Pac J Ophthalmol(Phila),2013,2(5):305-309.
［16］　PEYMAN G A,CHEEMA R A,CONWAY M D.Closure of chronic macular holes using passive aspiration to the edges of the macular hole［J］.Ophthalmic Surg Lasers,2001,32(6):486-489.
［17］　WANG H,JI M,DI R,QI R,PEI C,GAO S,et al.Parafoveal retinal massage combined with autologous blood cover in the management of giant,persistent or recurrent macular holes［J］.Int J Ophthalmol,2020,13(11):1773-1779.
［18］　MOHAMMED O A,ANANT P.New surgical technique for management of recurrent macular hole［J］.Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol,2017,24(1):61-63.
［19］　THEODOSSIADIS G,PETROU P,ELEFTHERIADOU M,MOUSTAKAS A L,DATSERIS I,THEODOSSIADIS P.Focal vitreomacular traction:a prospective study of the evolution to macular hole:the mathematical approach［J］.Eye(Lond),2014,28(12):1452-1460.
［20］　TARITA-NISTOR L,GONZLEZ E G,MANDELCORN M S,LILLAKAS L,STEINBACH M J,STEINBACH M J.Fixation stability,fixation location,and visual acuity after successful macular hole surgery［J］.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2009,50(1):84-89.
［21］　梁冬青,刘玉燕,董益,王莹,韩洪泉.特发性黄斑裂孔手术前后微视野及光相干断层扫描血管成像变化特征［J］.中华眼底病杂志,2020,36(7):533-538.
LIANG D Q,LIU Y Y，DONG Y，WANG Y,HAN H Q.The changing characteristics of microperimeter and optical coherence tomography angiography before and after idiopathic macular hole surgery［J］.Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,2020,36(7):533-538.
［22］　CARPINETO P,BORRELLI E,CERINO L,GUARINI D,AHARRH-GNAMA A,CICIARELLI V,et al.Inverted ILM flap technique in idiopathic full-thickness macular hole surgery:functional outcomes and their correlation with morphologic findings［J］.J Ophthalmol,2021,2021:6624904.

相似文献/References:

[1]董敬远 刘瑶 吴晓艳.玻璃体切割联合白内障手术治疗增生性糖尿病视网膜病变[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(5):000.
[2]张楚 邹玉平 邹秀兰 徐哲 王泳.内窥镜引导玻璃体视网膜手术治疗伴有角膜混浊的外伤性视网膜脱离[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(6):000.
[3]刘刚 马英慧 贾万程.玻璃体切割术联合视网膜光凝或内界膜剥除术治疗黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离的疗效分析[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(7):000.
[4]范松涛 卢建民.阿司匹林与糖尿病患者玻璃体出血以及玻璃体切割术疗效的相关性研究[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(11):000.
[5]刘敬花 李松峰 卢海.23G微创玻璃体切割术在增生性糖尿病视网膜病变治疗中的应用[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(11):000.
[6]王蕊 王兴利 王一.玻璃体切割术治疗球内金属异物并发眼内炎的玻璃体腔填充物的选择[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(11):000.
[7]杨铮 陈彬川 周瑞雅.玻璃体手术后高眼压及其处理[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(11):000.
[8]陈吉婷 李学喜 王志军.两种手术方式取出眼后段磁性异物的对比研究[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(11):000.
[9]张保松.复杂开放性眼外伤手术疗效及其相关影响因素分析[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(12):000.
[10]杜新华 吴强 宋蓓雯 陈永东 陈颖 罗兰.非外伤性玻璃体积血的发病原因及疗效分析[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(1):000.
[11]万超 徐方 华瑞 赵宁 刘宁宁 柳力敏 才娜 陈蕾.吲哚菁绿染色与无染色视网膜内界膜剥除治疗黄斑裂孔的疗效观察[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(8):000.
[12]高丰玫. 特发性黄斑裂孔玻璃体切割术后视力恢复及黄斑解剖愈合的相关因素分析[J].眼科新进展,2015,35(5):460.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0125]
　GAO Feng-Mei. Correlation analysis of postoperative visual acuity and macular anatomical outcomes after vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2015,35(11):460.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0125]
[13]杜磊,陈佳,龙婷,等.玻璃体切割联合内界膜（ILM）剥除术与玻璃体切割联合ILM瓣覆盖术治疗不同直径特发性黄斑裂孔的疗效和安全性对比分析[J].眼科新进展,2017,37(2):140.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0037]
　DU Lei,CHEN Jia,LONG Ting,et al.Effects of PPV combined with internal limiting membrane flap surgery on idiopathic macular hole[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2017,37(11):140.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0037]
[14]陈勇,刘向玲,宋子宣,等.特发性黄斑裂孔OCT影像与术后早期视力恢复的相关性研究[J].眼科新进展,2017,37(3):275.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0069]
　CHEN Yong,LIU Xiang-Ling,SONG Zi-Xuan,et al.Correlation of OCT image with postoperative early visual outcomes among patients with idiopathic macular holes[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2017,37(11):275.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0069]
[15]付维,樊芳,贾志旸.特发性黄斑裂孔诊治进展[J].眼科新进展,2018,38(10):995.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0235]
　FU Wei,FAN Fang,JIA Zhi-Yang.Progress in diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic macular hole[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2018,38(11):995.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0235]
[16]熊晓忆,游志鹏,谢平,等.基于中央凹下脉络膜厚度预测特发性黄斑裂孔患者的解剖学预后[J].眼科新进展,2023,43(4):290.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2023.0059]
　XIONG Xiaoyi,YOU Zhipeng,XIE Ping,et al.Prediction of anatomical prognosis of idiopathic macular holes based on the subfoveal choroid thickness[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2023,43(11):290.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2023.0059]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
河南省医学科技攻关联合共建项目（编号：LHGJ20190187）；河南省医学教育研究联合共建项目（编号：Wjlx2020050）
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-11-05