[1]李勇,杜婧,李晶,等.不同频率强脉冲光联合睑板腺按摩治疗睑板腺功能障碍导致的干眼症患者的临床疗效[J].眼科新进展,2020,40(12):1152-1156.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2020.0256]
　LI Yong,DU Jing,LI Jing,et al.Clinical effect analysis of different frequencies on intense pulsed light combined with meibomian gland massage for meibomian gland dysfunction associated with dry eye[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2020,40(12):1152-1156.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2020.0256]
点击复制

不同频率强脉冲光联合睑板腺按摩治疗睑板腺功能障碍导致的干眼症患者的临床疗效/HTML
分享到：

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
40卷
期数:
2020年12期
页码:
1152-1156
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2020-12-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical effect analysis of different frequencies on intense pulsed light combined with meibomian gland massage for meibomian gland dysfunction associated with dry eye
文章编号:
1152
作者:
李勇; 杜婧; 李晶; 魏升升; 刘建国; 万雅群
710004　陕西省西安市，西安市人民医院（西安市第四医院）眼屈光中心
Author(s):
LI Yong; DU Jing; LI Jing; WEI Shengsheng; LIU Jianguo; WAN Yaqun
The Refractive Center of Ophthalmology,Xi’an People’s Hospital (Xi’an Fourth Hospital),Xi’an 710004,Shaanxi Province,China
关键词:
睑板腺功能障碍; 强脉冲光; 治疗频率; 睑板腺按摩
Keywords:
meibomian gland dysfunction;  intense pulsed light;  treatment frequency;  meibomian gland expression
分类号:
R777.2
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2020.0256
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　探讨不同治疗频率强脉冲光（IPL）联合睑板腺按摩治疗睑板腺功能障碍（MGD）导致的干眼症患者的临床疗效。方法　选取2017年8月至2018年8月于西安市人民医院（西安市第四医院）眼屈光中心就诊的患有MGD导致的干眼症患者30例60眼，最终纳入25例50眼。分别在0周，间隔1周（第1周）、间隔2周（第3周）以及间隔4周（第7周）各进行1次IPL治疗，共治疗4次。对患者进行问卷调查眼表疾病指数量表评分；采用眼表综合分析仪定量测定各间隔治疗期患者泪河高度、平均非侵入性泪膜破裂时间、首次非侵入性泪膜破裂时间，通过红外照相功能检测患者睑板腺缺失情况；对患者睑板腺分泌能力、睑板腺分泌物性状进行评分，并行角膜荧光素染色检查。结果　治疗间隔1周、间隔2周和间隔4周时患者的眼表疾病指数量表评分明显低于治疗前，而治疗间隔1周、间隔2周和间隔4周之间的差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）； 非侵入性泪膜破裂时间、首次非侵入性泪膜破裂时间在各治疗间隔期明显高于治疗前（均为P<0.05）；两两比较显示治疗间隔1周、间隔2周的泪河高度高于治疗前（均为P<0.05），治疗间隔4周的泪河高度较间隔1周和间隔2周下降（均为P<0.05)。治疗间隔1周、间隔2周、间隔4周的睑板腺分泌能力评分均低于治疗前（均为P<0.05）；治疗间隔2周和间隔4周的睑板腺分泌能力评分均低于治疗间隔1周（均为P<0.05）。治疗间隔1周、间隔2周、间隔4周的睑板腺分泌物性状评分均低于治疗前（均为P<0.05）；治疗间隔4周的睑板腺分泌物性状评分低于治疗间隔1周（P<0.05）。治疗间隔1周、间隔2周、间隔4周的角膜荧光素染色等级均低于治疗前（均为P<0.05）。经IPL联合睑板腺按摩治疗4次后患者睑板腺的腺体较治疗前清晰，睑结膜面的新生血管及炎症的红外成像明显减轻，但未见缺失睑板腺腺体恢复。结论　IPL联合睑板腺按摩治疗可缓解MGD导致的干眼症患者的干眼症状，治疗间隔2周可以很好地兼顾疗效和安全性以及患者的经济负担。
Abstract:
Objective　To investigate the clinical effect of different frequency on intense pulsed light (IPL) with and meibomian gland massage for meibomian gland dysfunction（MGD）associated with dry eye.Methods　Thirty patients (60 eyes) with MGD treated at the Eye Refractive Center of Xi’an People’s Hospital (Xi’an Fourth Hospital) from August 2017 to August 2018 were selected. Finally, 50 eyes of 25 patients were included. All the subjects received four times IPL with meibomian gland massage therapy at 0 weeks, the first week, the third week and the seventh week. The ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scale questionnaire score was performed in all subjects, and tear meniscus height (TMH), average noninvasive tear film rupture time (NIBUTav), first noninvasive tear breakuptime (NIBUTf) were measured, meibole secretion status and meibole secretion trait score was conducted, and corneal fluorescein staining were performed to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment frequencies.Results　The scores of ocular surface disease index scale on week 1, week 3 and week 7 were significantly lower than before treatment. However, there were no significant differences between week 1, week 3 and week 7 (P>0.05). NIBUTav and NIBUTf were significantly higher than those before treatment (both P<0.05). The TMHs on week 1 and week 3 were higher than that before treatment (both P<0.05), and the TMHs on week 7 was lower than that on week 1 and week 3. Scores of meibomian gland excretion ability on week 1, week 3 and week 7 were all lower than before treatment (all P<0.05), and week 3 and week 7 were lower than that on week 1 after treatment (both P<0.05). The traits scores of meibomian gland secretion on week 1, week 3 and week 7 were all lower than those before treatment (all P<0.05), and week 7 was lower than that on week 1 after treatment (P<0.05). The corneal fluorescein staining grades on week 1, week 3 and week 7 after treatment were all lower than before treatment (all P<0.05). After IPL combined with meibomian gland massage for 4 times, the glands of the meibomian gland in the patients were clearer than before treatment, and the infrared imaging of new blood vessels and inflammation in the meibomian conjunctiva surface was significantly reduced, but no recovery of missing meibomian glands was observed.Conclusion　IPL combined with meibomian gland massage can reduce the symptoms of MGD patients and improve related indicators of dry eyes. When the treatment frequency is 2 weeks apart, the efficacy and safety can be well achieved.

参考文献/References:

［1］　UCHINO M,YOKOI N,UCHINO Y,DOGRU M,KAWASHIMA M,KOMURO A,et al.Prevalence of dry eye disease and its risk factors in visual display terminal users: the Osaka study［J］.Am J Ophthalmol,2013,156(4):759-766.
［2］　CRAIG J P,NICHOLS K K,NICHOLS J J,CAFFERY B,STAPLETON F.TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report［J］.Ocul Surf,2017,15(3):276-283.
［3］　GIANNACCARE G,PELLEGRINI M,SEBASTIANI S,BERNABEI F,CAMPOS EMILIO C.Efficacy of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation for treatment of dry eye disease: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials［J］.Cornea,2019,38(5):565-573.
［4］　TOYOS R,MCGILL W,BRISCOE D.Intense pulsed light treatment for dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction: a 3-year retrospective study［J］.Photomed Laser Surg,2015,33(1):41-46.
［5］　戴鹏飞，李颖，田芳，王玉倩，倪珊珊，王洁.强脉冲光联合睑板腺按摩与眼睑熏蒸按摩治疗MGD相关干眼的疗效对比［J］.国际眼科杂志,2019,19(12):2101-2106.
DAI P F,LI Y,TIAN F,WANG Y Q,NI S S,WANG J.Efficacy comparison of intense pulsed light combined with meibomian gland massage and eyelid fumigation massage in the treatment of MGD-related dry eyes［J］.Int Eye Sci,2019,19(12):2101-2106.
［6］　ZUAZO F,LPEZ-PONCE D,SALINAS-TORO D,VALENZUELA F,SANS-PUROJA J,SRUR M,et al.Conjunctival impression cytology in patients with normal and impaired OSDI scores［J］.Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol,2014,89(10):391-396.
［7］　洪晶.我国睑板腺功能障碍诊断与治疗专家共识(2017年)［J］.中华眼科杂志,2017,53(9):657-661.
HONG J.Diagnosis and treatment of Meibomian gland dysfunction in China（2017）［J］.Chin J Ophthalmol,2017,53(9):657-661.
［8］　AMPARO F,WANG H,YIN J,MARMALIDOU A,DANA R.Evaluating corneal fluorescein staining using a novel automated method［J］.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2017,58(6):168-173.
［9］　BERTA A,TOTH-MOLNAR E,CSUTAK A.New international consensus statement about the definition,classification,ethiology,diagnostics and therapy of dry eye (TFOS DEWS II)［J］.Orv Hetil,2018,159(20):775-785.
［10］　PAPAGEORGIOU P,CLAYTON W,NORWOOD S,CHOPRA S,RUSTIN M.Treatment of rosacea with intense pulsed light: significant improvement and long-lasting results ［J］.Br J Dermatol,2008,159(3):628-632.
［11］　FARIVAR S,MALEKSHAHABI T,SHIARI R.Biological effects of low level laser therapy［J］.J Lasers Med Sci,2014,5(2):58-62.
［12］　LIU R,BEI R,PING T,TANG Y,SONG W.Analysis of cytokine levels in tears and clinical correlations after intense pulsed light treating Meibomian gland dysfunction［J］.Am J Ophthalmol,2017,183:81-90.
［13］　MEJA L F,GIL J,JARAMILLO M.Intense pulsed light therapy: a promising complementary treatment for dry eye disease［J］.Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol,2019,94:331-336.
［14］　LI D,LIN S B,CHENG B.Intense pulsed light treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction in skin types III/IV［J］.Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg,2019,37(2):70-76.
［15］　YIN Y,LIU N,GONG L,SONG N.Changes in the meibomian gland after exposure to intense pulsed light in meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) patients［J］.Curr Eye Res,2018,43(3):308-313.
［16］　JIANG X,LV H,HANG S,ZHANG M,LIU Y.Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of intense pulsed light in the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction ［J］.J Ophthalmol,2016,2016:1910694.
［17］　CABALLERO S G,MADRONA J,REINA E C.Effect of pulsed laser light in patients with dry eye syndrome［J］.Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol,2017,92(11):509-515.
［18］　QIU J J,SUN T,FU S H,YU Y F,YOU Z P,ZHANG Q,et al.A study of dry eye after cataract surgery in MGD patients［J］.Int Ophthalmol,2020,40(5):1277-1284.

相似文献/References:

[1]皮百木 穆红梅 张婉婷 郑娜 李娟.老年干眼患者眼表改变及其与睑板腺功能障碍的相关性[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(6):000.
[2]谭业双 周霞 许 玲 王玲丽 樊玲.抗炎治疗睑板腺功能障碍的临床研究[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(1):000.
[3]杨帆,曾庆延.睑板腺功能障碍治疗进展[J].眼科新进展,2016,36(10):996.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0267]
　YANG Fan,ZENG Qing-Yan.Research progress on treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2016,36(12):996.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0267]
[4]李妍,桑璇,王晓然,等.干眼患者泪膜脂质层厚度检测及其与眼表体征的相关性分析[J].眼科新进展,2017,37(4):344.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0087]
　LI Yan,SANG Xuan,WANG Xiao-Ran,et al.Measurement of tear film lipid layer thickness in dry eye patients and its relationship with ocular surface signs[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2017,37(12):344.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0087]
[5]余婷,叶芬,施宇华,等.睑板腺功能障碍患者的视觉质量分析[J].眼科新进展,2017,37(10):966.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0245]
　YU Ting,YE Fen,SHI Yu-Hua,et al.Evaluation of visual quality in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2017,37(12):966.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0245]
[6]袁媛.干眼危险因素的研究[J].眼科新进展,2017,37(12):1173.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0296]
　YUAN Yuan.Risk factors for dry eye[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2017,37(12):1173.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0296]
[7]石文卿,孙铁,朱佩文,等.老年性睑板腺功能障碍患者下睑内翻的两种术式疗效对比[J].眼科新进展,2018,38(11):1041.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0245]
　SHI Wen-Qing,SUN Tie,ZHU Pei-Wen,et al.Analysis of the effect of two surgical correction methods for lower eyelid entropion in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2018,38(12):1041.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0245]
[8]熊超,赖瑶,艾丽珍,等.红外线照相技术联合活体共聚焦显微镜对轻度睑板腺功能障碍患者早期诊断价值的研究[J].眼科新进展,2021,41(1):069.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0015]
　XIONG Chao,LAI Yao,AI Lizhen,et al.The value of infrared photography combined with in vivo confocal microscopy in the early diagnosis of patients with mild meibomian gland dysfunction[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2021,41(12):069.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0015]
[9]王蓉,邓应平.水液缺乏型干眼和混合型干眼患者睑板腺形态及功能差异[J].眼科新进展,2021,41(8):783.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0163]
　WANG Rong,DENG Yingping.Morphologic and functional differences of meibomian gland in patients with aqueous-deficient dry eyes and mixed dry eyes[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2021,41(12):783.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0163]
[10]曹宇辰,张杰鑫,黎颖莉,等.有无睑板腺功能障碍患者眼表菌群组成对比[J].眼科新进展,2021,41(12):1138.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0238]
　CAO Yuchen,ZHANG Jiexin,LI Yingli,et al.Comparison of ocular surface microbial colonies between patients with and without meibomian gland dysfunction[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2021,41(12):1138.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0238]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
陕西省自然科学基础研究计划面上项目（编号：2017JM8043）；西安市卫生健康委员会一般研究项目（编号：2020yb11）；西安市第四医院科研孵化基金项目（编号：FZ-4）
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-05