[1]樊保良,王静,邵雨双,等.Lenstar LS900测量仪与 iTrace视觉功能分析仪测量白内障患者术前Kappa角与Alpha角一致性研究[J].眼科新进展,2020,40(4):340-343.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2020.0078]
　FAN Baoliang,WANG Jing,SHAO Yushuang,et al.Comparative study on consistency of Lenstar LS900 and iTrace for measuring Kappa angle and Alpha angle in cataract patients before surgery[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2020,40(4):340-343.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2020.0078]
点击复制

Lenstar LS900测量仪与 iTrace视觉功能分析仪测量白内障患者术前Kappa角与Alpha角一致性研究/HTML
分享到：

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
40卷
期数:
2020年4期
页码:
340-343
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2020-04-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative study on consistency of Lenstar LS900 and iTrace for measuring Kappa angle and Alpha angle in cataract patients before surgery
作者:
樊保良; 王静; 邵雨双; 李阳; 廉飞玥; 张劲松; 秦宇
110005　辽宁省沈阳市，中国医科大学附属第四医院眼科，中国医科大学眼科医院，辽宁省晶状体学重点实验室
Author(s):
FAN Baoliang; WANG Jing; SHAO Yushuang; LI Yang; LIAN Feiyue; ZHANG Jinsong; QIN Yu
Department of Ophthalmology，the Fourth Hospital of China Medical University，Eye Hospital of China Medical University ，Shenyang 110005，Liaoning Province，China
关键词:
白内障; Lenstar LS900; iTrace视觉功能分析仪; Kappa角; Alpha角
Keywords:
cataract;  Lenstar LS900;  iTrace aberrometer;  Kappa angle;  Alpha angle
分类号:
R776.1
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2020.0078
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　比较Lenstar LS900测量仪与iTrace视觉功能分析仪测量年龄相关性白内障患者术前Kappa角与Alpha角的一致性。方法　收集2017年12月至2018年6月在中国医科大学附属第四医院眼科就诊的年龄相关性白内障患者55例（59眼），术前分别应用Lenstar LS900测量仪和iTrace视觉功能分析仪测量以瞳孔为中心的视轴偏心距（Kappa角）和以虹膜为中心的视轴偏心距（Alpha角）。先收集在角膜顶点平面分解的X轴和Y轴坐标，再通过三角函数计算偏心距，最后分别比较X轴、Y轴、瞳孔直径、角膜水平直径、视轴偏心距。两种仪器所测数据的比较采用配对t检验，一致性比较采用Bland-Altman分析。结果　Lenstar LS900测量的Kappa角为（0.270±0.128）mm，Alpha角为（0.349±0.128）mm，瞳孔直径为（4.101±0.773）mm，角膜水平直径（白到白，WTW）为（10.848±0.467）mm，X轴Kappa角为（0.016±0.225）mm，Y轴Kappa角为（0.105±0.185）mm，X轴Alpha角为（0.010±0.353）mm，Y轴Alpha角为（0.042±0.195）mm。iTrace视觉功能分析仪测量的Kappa角为（0.296±0.131）mm，Alpha角为（0.338±0.121）mm，瞳孔直径为（4.103±0.797）mm，角膜水平直径（白到白，WTW）为（10.837±0.475）mm，X轴Kappa角为（0.022±0.233）mm，Y轴Kappa角为（0.091±0.172）mm，X轴Alpha角为（0.006±0.345）mm，Y轴Alpha角为（0.029±0.112）mm。两种仪器测量各项数据比较，差异均无统计学意义（均为P>0.05）。Bland-Altman分析显示，两种仪器的检测结果具有较好的一致性。结论　Lenstar LS900与iTrace两种仪器测量年龄相关性白内障患者术前的Kappa角和Alpha角的一致性良好，能够为屈光性人工晶状体的选择提供一定的参考依据。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the consistency of Lenstar LS900 and iTrace for measuring Kappa angle and Alpha angle in patients with age-related cataract before surgery.Methods　From December 2017 to June 2018, 55 patients (59 eyes) with age-related cataract were collected from Ophthalmology Department of the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Chinese Medical University. Before surgery, the pupil centered axis of sight eccentric distance (Kappa angle) and the iris centered axis of sight eccentric distance (Alpha angle) were measured by Lenstar LS900 and iTrace respectively. Firstly, The X-axis and Y-axis coordinates were measured in the iris plane, and then the eccentric distance was calculated by trigonometric function. Finally, the X-axis, Y-axis, pupil diameter, corneal horizontal diameter and axis of sight eccentric distance were compared respectively. The paired t-test was used to compare the data measured by the two instruments. Bland-altman analysis was used for consistency comparison.Results　Lenstar LS900 measurement showed that the Kappa angle was (0.270±0.128) mm, the Alpha angle was (0.349±0.128) mm, pupil diameter was (4.101±0.773) mm, corneal horizontal diameter (white to white, WTW) was (10.848±0.467) mm, Kappa angle at X-axis was (0.016±0.225) mm, Kappa angle at Y-axis was (0.105±0.185) mm, Alpha angle at X-axis was (0.010±0.353) mm, and Alpha angle at Y-axis was (0.042±0.195) mm. Measurement by iTrace showed that Kappa angle was (0.296±0.131) mm, Alpha angle was (0.338±0.121) mm, pupil diameter was (4.103±0.797) mm, corneal horizontal diameter (white to white, WTW) was (10.837±0.475) mm, Kappa angle at X-axis was (0.022±0.233) mm, Kappa angle at Y-axis was (0.091±0.172) mm, Alpha angle at X-axis was (0.006±0.345) mm and Alpha angle at Y-axis was (0.029±0.112) mm. There was no significant difference in each data between the two instruments (all P>0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed that there was a good consistency of test results between the two instruments.Conclusion　There is a good consistency between Lenstar LS900 and iTrace in measuring the Alpha angle and Kappa angle in patients with age-related cataract before surgery, which can provide some reference for the selection of refractive intraocular lens.

参考文献/References:

［1］　PARK C Y,OH S Y,CHUCK R S.Measurement of angle Kappa and centration in refractive surgery［J］.Curr Opin Ophthalmol,2012,23(4):269-275.
［2］　杜新华,杨亚波.LASIK治疗近视后切削中心的角膜地形图观察［J］.中国实用眼科杂志,2000,18(9):565-567.
DU X H，YANG Y B.Topographical observation of centration of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis for treatment of myopia［J］.Clin J Pract Ophthalmol,2000,18(9):565-567.
［3］　VERDON W,BULLIMORE M,MALONEY R K.Visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy［J］.Arch Ophthalmol,1996,114(12):1465.
［4］　高心怡.年龄相关性白内障患者Kappa角和Alpha角的变化趋势研究［D］.沈阳:中国医科大学,2017.
GAO X Y.Research on the changing trend of angle Kappa and angle alpha in age-related cataract patients［D］.Shenyang:China Medical University,2017.
［5］　PRAKASH G,PRAKASH D R,AGARWAL A,KUMAR D A,JACOB S,AGARWAL A.Predictive factor and Kappa angle analysis for visual satisfactions in patients with multifocal IOL implantation［J］.Eye(Lond),2011,25(9):1187-1193.
［6］　MOSHIRFAR M,HOGGAN R N,MUTHAPPAN V.Angle Kappa and its importance in refractive surgery［J］.Oman J Ophthalmol,2013,6(3):151-158.
［7］　LOMBARDO M,LOMBARDO G.Wave aberration of human eyes and new descriptors of image optical quality and visual performance［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg,2010,36(2):313-331.
［8］　SACHDEV N,ORMONDE S E,SHERWIN T,MCGHEE C N.Higher-order aberrations of lenticular opacities［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg,2004,30(8):1640-1648.
［9］　陈琛,叶剑,黄婵娟,艾李倩玉.不同Kappa角眼多焦点人工晶状体植入术后的视觉质量［J］.中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2016,18(5):298-301.
CHEN C,YE J,HAUNG C J,AI L Q Y.The visual quality after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses in different angle Kappa eyes［J］.Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2016,18(5):298-301.
［10］ALIJORGE L,VEGA-ESTRADA A,PLAZA-PUCHE A B.Clinical outcomes with a new microincisional diffractive multifocal IOL［J］.Eye Vis(Lond),2015,2(1):2.

相似文献/References:

[1]乔建治 张永喜.抗青光眼术后白内障行不同切口超声乳化术的临床疗效分析[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(4):000.
[2]吴星.年龄相关性白内障患者超声乳化手术前后对比敏感度分析[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(6):000.
[3]王勇 叶应嘉 鲍先议 周龑丽 许荣 彭婷婷 曾志富.同轴微小切口超声乳化吸出术在青光眼滤过术后白内障摘出术中的应用[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(7):000.
[4]徐威.注射器针头囊袋内吸附劈核法在白内障手术中的应用[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(7):000.
[5]冉文瑛 陈静 张树利.抗青光眼术后不同角膜切口白内障超声乳化术对角膜屈光状态的影响[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(7):000.
[6]王运.常规连续模式超声乳化术与爆破模式冷超声乳化术治疗白内障的临床疗效比较[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(11):000.
[7]郭照洪 王宏 宋爱平 文译 侯祺 解柳.超声乳化白内障摘出联合人工晶状体植入治疗超高度轴性近视白内障患者的临床疗效[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(1):000.
[8]刘珣 王欣玲 柏全豪 张劲松 阎启昌.IOLMaster与四种人工晶状体屈光度计算公式的准确性研究[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(2):000.
[9]张灿伟 黄旭东 姜雅琴 高婧 孙先勇 张杰 任建涛.α晶状体蛋白抗体与超声乳化术后前房炎症反应的相关性[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(6):000.
[10]唐东永 李霞 梁皓 何剑 谭少健.应用超声生物显微镜观察Bigbag人工晶状体在高度近视眼囊袋内的稳定性[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(6):000.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金青年基金项目（编号：81600717);辽宁省自然科学基金项目（编号：201602851）
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-05