[1]李金孝,王雁,徐路路,等.SMILE术后角膜帽的观察研究——基于傅里叶频域光学相干断层扫描(FD-OCT)[J].眼科新进展,2020,40(2):131-136.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2020.0031]
 LI Jinxiao,WANG Yan,XU Lulu,et al.Observation of corneal cap after SMILE by FD-OCT[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2020,40(2):131-136.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2020.0031]
点击复制

SMILE术后角膜帽的观察研究——基于傅里叶频域光学相干断层扫描(FD-OCT)/HTML
分享到:

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
40卷
期数:
2020年2期
页码:
131-136
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2020-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Observation of corneal cap after SMILE by FD-OCT
作者:
李金孝王雁徐路路危平辉吴雅楠张悦邹昊瀚
300020 天津市,天津医科大学眼科临床学院(李金孝,张悦,邹昊瀚);300020 天津市,天津市眼科医院(王雁,徐路路,危平辉,吴雅楠);300020 天津市,天津市眼科学与视觉科学重点实验室(王雁)
Author(s):
LI Jinxiao1WANG Yan23XU Lulu2WEI Pinghui2WU Yanan2ZHANG Yue1ZOU Haohan1
1.Clinical College of Ophthalmology,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300020,China
2.Tianjin Eye Hospital,Tianjin 300020,China
3.Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science,Tianjin 300020,China
关键词:
小切口角膜基质透镜取出术VisuMax飞秒激光OCT近视角膜帽厚度
Keywords:
SMILEVisuMax femtosecond laseroptical coherence tomographymyopiacap thickness
分类号:
R779.6
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2020.0031
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 通过傅里叶频域光学相干断层扫描(FD-OCT)对VisuMax飞秒激光制作角膜帽的早期临床观察,评价帽厚度的精确性、重复性、均一性及规整性,并研究SMILE术后不同方向不同时间帽厚度变化及其角膜上皮等可能的影响因素。方法 回顾性研究。选取44例(87眼)拟行SMILE术的近视患者,采用FD-OCT测量术后1周、1个月角膜6 mm直径范围内水平和垂直子午线方向的角膜帽厚度。应用RVe软件工具在每个截面图上特定的7个点标定角膜帽的厚度。采用配对样本t检验分析术后帽厚度预期值与实际值差异及术后不同时间帽厚度差异,术后角膜帽厚度与术前参数等相关性采用Pearson线性相关分析。结果 精确性:术后实际角膜帽厚度均较理论值厚,差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05);重复性:术后1周、1个月水平方向帽厚度标准差分别为2.64 μm、3.41 μm,术后1周、1个月垂直方向帽厚度标准差分别为3.36 μm、3.10 μm;均一性:术后1周水平方向各位点的帽厚度差异有统计学意义(t=3.246,P=0.004)、术后1个月水平方向各位点的帽厚度差异也有统计学意义(t=2.295,P=0.034);术后1周、1个月垂直方向各位点帽厚度差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。术后不同时间帽厚度相关影响因素:中央角膜厚度(CCT)与术后1周、1个月角膜帽厚度均存在正相关性(r=0.438、0.360,P<0.001、0.001),术前角膜中央区上皮厚度与术后1周、1个月角膜帽厚度均存在正相关性(r=0.323、0.296,P=0.002、0.005),且CCT对术后角膜帽厚度的影响较大。多元线性回归方程结果显示:术后1周角膜帽厚度=96.226+0.032×CCT+0.212×术前角膜中央区上皮厚度,术后1个月角膜帽厚度=97.022+0.029×CCT+0.219×术前角膜中央区上皮厚度。结论 飞秒激光制帽早期可有良好的可重复性,且角膜帽形态均一、规整。随着术前CCT及角膜中央区上皮厚度的增厚,术后帽厚度较预设帽厚度厚,影响制帽的精确性。其中术前角膜CCT是影响角膜帽厚度的主要因素。
Abstract:
Objective To conduce early clinical evaluation of corneal cap made by VisuMax femtosecond laser using fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT),evaluate the precision,repeatability,uniformity and regularity of corneal cap thickness and analyze changes of cap thickness at different directions and time points and other related influencing factors including corneal epithelium.Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 44 myopic patients (87 eyes) who were scheduled to received SMILE operation.The thickness of corneal cap was measured within 6 mm diameter at two meridians (horizontal direction and vertical direction) by FD-OCT 1 week and 1 month after operation.RVe software was used to detect thickness of corneal cap at specific 7 points in each sectional view.Paired sample t test were used to compare the difference between the expected and actual values of cap thickness and the difference of cap thickness at different postoperative times.Correlation between postoperative cap thickness and preoperative parameters was analyzed by Pearson linear correlation analysis.Results Accuracy:The actual postoperative corneal cap thickness was thicker than the theoretical value,and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05).Repeatability:At postoperative 1 week and 1 month, the standard deviations of corneal thickness were 2.64 μm and 3.41 μm in horizontal direction,3.36 μm and 3.10 μm in vertical direction.Uniformity:There were statistical differences in cap thickness among different sites in horizontal direction at postoperative 1 week and 1 month (t=3.246,P=0.004;t=2.295,P=0.034),but no difference was found in cap thickness among different sites in vertical direction at postoperative 1 week and 1 month (all P>0.05).Related factors of cap thickness at different postoperative times:Corneal cap thickness at postoperative 1 week and 1 month had positive correlation with central corneal thickness (CCT;r=0.438,P<0.001;r=0.360,P<0.001) and central corneal epithelium thickness (r=0.323,P=0.002;r=0.296,P=0.005).CCT had a greater effect on postoperative corneal cap thickness.Multiple linear regression equation indicated that:Corneal cap thickness at postoperative 1 week=96.222+0.032×CCT+0.212×preoperative central corneal epithelium thickness;corneal cap thickness at postoperative 1 month=97.022+0.029×CCT+0.219×preoperative central corneal epithelium thickness.Conclusion Corneal cap made by femtosecond laser has a good repeatability,and was with uniform and regular shape.With the thickening of preoperative central corneal epithelium thickness and CCT,the postoperative cap thickness is thicker than theoretical value,which affects the accuracy of cap.Preoperative CCT is the main factor affecting corneal cap thickness.

参考文献/References:

[1] ZHOU Y H,TIAN L,WANG N L,DOUGHERTY P J.Anterior segment optical coherence tomography measurement of LASIK flaps:femtosecond laser vs microkeratome[J].J Refract Surg,2011,27(6):408-416.
[2] PFAEFFL W A,KUNZ E,ZENK U,PFAEFFL M B,SCHUSTER T,LOHMNN C.Predictive factors of femtosecond laser flap thickness measured by online optical coherence pachymetry subtraction in sub-Bowman keratomileusis[J].J Cataract Refract Surg,2008,34(11):1872-1880.
[3] PRAKASH G,AGARWAL A,JACOB S,KUMAR D A,GGARWAL A,BANERJEE R.Comparison of Fourier-domain and time-domain optical coherence tomography for assessment of corneal thickness and intersession repeatability[J].Am J Ophthalmol,2009,148(2):282-290.
[4] DURRIE D S,KEZIRIAN G M.Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis:Prospective contralateral eye study[J].J Cataract Refract Surg,2005,31(1):120-126.
[5] KNORZ M C,VOSSMERBAEUMER U.Comparison of flap Adhesion strength using the amadeus microkeratome and the IntraLase iFS femtosecond laser in rabbits[J].J Refract Surg,2008,24(9):385-387.
[6] FU D,WANG L,ZHOU X T,YU Z Q.Cap morphology after small-incision lenticule extraction and its effects on intraocular scattering[J].Int J Ophthalmol,2018,11(3):456-461.
[7] SALAROLI C H,LI Y,ZHANG X,TANG M,RAMOS J L,ALLEMANN N,et al.Repeatability of laser in situ keratomileusis flap thickness measurement by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography[J].J Cataract Refract Surg,2011,37 (4):649-654.
[8] CHENG X,PETSCHE S J,PINSKY P M.A structural model for the in vivo human cornea including collagen-swelling interaction[J].J R Soc Interface,2015,12(109):20150241.
[9] RUI D,WANG Y,XU L L,WU D,WU W,LI X.Comparison of corneal biomechanical characteristics after surface ablation refractive surgery and novel lamellar refractive surgery[J].Cornea,2015,34(11):1441-1446.
[10] ROCHA K M,KRUEGER R R.Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography epithelial and flap thickness mapping in femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis[J].Am J Ophthalmol,2014,158(2):293-301.
[11] KANELLOPOULOS A J,ASIMELLIS G.Longitudinal postoperative lasik epithelial thickness profile changes in correlation with degree of myopia correction[J].J Refract Surg,2014,30(3):166-171.
[12] NASSARALLA B A,MCLEOD S D,NASSARALLA J J J.Effect of myopic LASIK on human corneal sensitivity[J] Ophthalmology,2003,110(3):497-502.
[13] LAWRENSON J G,RUSKELL G L.Investigation of limbal touch sensitivity using a Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer[J].Br J Ophthalmol,1993,77(6):339-343.
[14] 魏升升,王雁,耿维莉,金颖,左彤,王璐,等.飞秒激光小切口基质透镜取出术和飞秒激光基质透镜取出术后早期角膜知觉变化的对比研究[J].中华眼科杂志,2013,49(4):299-304.

WEI S S,WANG Y,GENG W L,JIN Y,ZUO T,WANG L,et al.Early outcomes of corneal sensitivity changes after small lenticule extraction and femtosecond lenticule extraction[J].Chin J Ophthalmol,2013,49(4):299-304.
[15] REINSTEIN D Z,SRIVANNABOON S,GOBBE M,ARCHER T J,SILVERMAN R H,SUTTON H,et al.Epithelial thickness profile changes induced by myopic lasik as measured by artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound[J].J Refract Surg,2009,25(5):444-450.
[16] 侯杰,雷玉琳,郑秀云.近视眼角膜上皮厚度分布特点及其与角膜生物力学性能的关系[J].中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2014,16(5):291-296.

HOU J,LEI Y L,ZHENG X Y.Corneal epithelial thickness in myopic eyes and its relationship with the corneal biomechanical properties[J].Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2014,16(5):291-296.
[17] FLANAGAN G W,BINDER P S.Precision of flap measurements for laser in situ keratomileusis in 4428 eyes[J].J Refract Surg,2003,19(2):113-123.
[18] REINSTEIN D Z,ARCHER T J,JBRADLEY R.Mathematical model to compare the relative tensile strength of the cornea after prk,lasik,and small incision lenticule extraction[J].J Refract Surg,2013,29(7):454-460.
[19] 田磊,周跃华,张青蔚,王宁利.飞秒激光制作的角膜瓣形态及其厚度的相关影响因素[J].眼科,2010,19(5):299-303.

TIAN L,ZHOU Y H,ZHANG Q W,WANG N L.The architecture and the predictive factors of the IntraLase FS60 femtosecond laser corneal flap[J].Ophthalmol CHN,2010,19(5):299-303.
[20] 徐玲娟,赵靖,谢立信,吴洁,孙大鹏.FD-OCT、Visante OCT及A超角膜测厚仪测量人中央角膜厚度的比较[J].眼科新进展,2011,31(3):250-253.

XU L J,ZHAO J,XIE L X,WU J,SUN D P.Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography,Visante optical coherence tomography and A ultrasound pachymetry[J].Rec Adv Ophthalmol,2011,31(3):250-253.
[21] WANG C,XIA X,TIAN B,ZHOU S.Comparison of Fourier-domain and time-domain optical coherence tomography in the measurement of thinnest corneal thickness in keratoconus[J].J Ophthalmol,2015,2015:402925.
[22] HALL R C,MOHAMED F K,HTOON H M,TAN D T,MEHTA J S.Laser in situ keratomileusis flap measurements:Comparison between observers and between spectral-domain and time-domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography[J].J Cataract Refract Surg,2011,37(3):544-551.
[23] 范罕英,张玙,杜之渝.飞秒激光与机械刀制瓣LASIK术后视觉质量的研究进展[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(7):697-700.

FAN H Y,ZHANG Y,DU Z Y,Recent advances in the effects of femtosecond laser combined with microkeratome LASIK on visual quality[J].Rec Adv Ophthalmol,2013,33(7):697-700.
[24] YAN H,GONG L Y,HUANG W,PENG Y L.Clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia:a Meta-analysis[J].Ophthalmology,2017,10(9):1436-1445.
[25] 潘海涛,胡钦瑞,王春红,黄振平.光学相干断层扫描分析飞秒激光LASIK角膜瓣厚度的可预测性[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(3):276-278.

PAN H T,HU Q R,WANG C H,HUANG Z P.Predictability of LASIK corneal flap thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in femtosecond laser[J].Rec Adv Ophthalmol,2013,33(3):276-278.

相似文献/References:

[1]潘海涛 胡钦瑞 王春红 黄振平.光学相干断层扫描分析飞秒激光LASIK角膜瓣厚度的可预测性[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(3):000.
[2]邢星,李世洋,赵爱红,等.小切口角膜基质透镜取出术与飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术对角膜生物力学特性影响的对比分析[J].眼科新进展,2018,38(12):1161.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0274]
 XING Xing,LI Shi-Yang,ZHAO Ai-Hong,et al.Comparison of changes in corneal biomechanical properties after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2018,38(2):1161.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0274]
[3]卢玥浩,夏丽坤.飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术矫正近视散光的研究进展[J].眼科新进展,2020,40(9):889.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2020.0202]
 LU Yuehao,XIA Likun.A review and update in myopic astigmatism correction by small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2020,40(2):889.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2020.0202]
[4]汪涛,韩欣言.角膜标记法飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术对角膜像差的影响[J].眼科新进展,2021,41(7):647.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0133]
 WANG Tao,HAN Xinyan.Corneal aberrations after SMILE by the cornea-marking methods[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2021,41(2):647.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0133]
[5]康婷婷,尹连荣,刘沙沙,等.SMILE术中大Kappa角的调整对术后全眼高阶像差的影响[J].眼科新进展,2023,43(10):790.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2023.0159]
 KANG Tingting,YIN Lianrong,LIU Shasha,et al.Effects of adjustment of large angle Kappa during small incision lenticule extraction on postoperative total higher-order aberrations[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2023,43(2):790.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2023.0159]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金资助(编号:81670884、81873684)
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-02-05