[1]毕文娇,吴洁,刘坤,等.Tomey OA-2000、IOL Master 700及 A 超角膜测厚仪测量近视患者中央角膜厚度的比较[J].眼科新进展,2019,39(8):776-779.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2019.0177]
　BI Wen-Jiao,WU Jie,LIU Kun,et al.Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by Tomey OA-2000,IOL Master 700 and A ultrasound pachymetry in myopic eyes[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2019,39(8):776-779.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2019.0177]
点击复制

Tomey OA-2000、IOL Master 700及 A 超角膜测厚仪测量近视患者中央角膜厚度的比较/HTML
分享到：

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
39卷
期数:
2019年8期
页码:
776-779
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2019-08-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by Tomey OA-2000,IOL Master 700 and A ultrasound pachymetry in myopic eyes
作者:
毕文娇; 吴洁; 刘坤; 王瑶
266071　山东省青岛市，山东第一医科大学（山东省医学科学院），山东省眼科研究所,省部共建-山东省眼科学重点实验室，青岛眼科医院
Author(s):
BI Wen-Jiao; WU Jie; LIU Kun; WANG Yao
Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Science,Shandong Eye Institute,State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base,Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology,Qingdao Eye Hospital,Qingdao 266071，Shandong Province，China
关键词:
中央角膜厚度; A 超角膜测厚仪; Tomey OA-2000; IOL Master700
Keywords:
central corneal thickness; A ultrasound pachymetry; Tomey OA-2000; IOL Master700
分类号:
R772.2
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2019.0177
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　比较 Tomey OA-2000、IOL Master700 及 A超角膜测厚仪测量近视患者中央角膜厚度(central corneal thickness,CCT)的差异性和一致性。方法　选取青岛眼科医院拟行角膜屈光手术的近视患者 56 例(112眼)，分别用Tomey OA-2000、IOL Master 700及A超角膜测厚仪测量双眼CCT，对三种仪器的测量结果进行统计学分析。结果　112 眼的CCT测量结果：A超角膜测厚仪为(542.23±26.88) μm，Tomey OA-2000为(521.75±26.51)μm，IOL Master 700为(519.53±28.15)μm。单因素方差分析结果显示，差异有统计学意义(F=23.737，P＜0.01)。两两比较结果显示，Tomey OA-2000、IOL Master 700 与 A 超角膜测厚仪之间差异均有统计学意义(均为P＜ 0.05)，其中A超角膜测厚仪测量的CCT值较Tomey OA-2000厚（20.48±8.16）μm，两者差值的95%可信区间为18.96～22.01 μm；A超角膜测厚仪测量CCT值较IOL Master 700厚（22.71±10.39）μm，两者差值的95%可信区间为 20.76 ～ 24.65 μm。Pearson相关分析显示，A超角膜测厚仪、Tomey OA-2000、IOL Master 700三种仪器测量值均呈高度相关(均为P＜0.01)。一致性分析结果显示，Tomey OA-2000、IOL Master 700测量的CCT值与A超角膜测厚仪相比一致性均较好。结论　Tomey OA-2000、IOL Master 700测量CCT的结果与A超角膜测厚仪相比具有良好的相关性和一致性，但其结果存在微小的差异，三者之间不能简单地互相替代。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the difference and consistency of central corneal thickness (CCT) measured by Tomey OA-2000，IOL Master700 and A ultrasound pachymetry（NIDEK US-500）in myopic eyes.Methods　CCT of 112 eyes from 56 myopic patients who underwent corneal refractive surgery in our hospital was measured three times by Tomey OA-2000，IOL Master 700 and A ultrasound pachymetry（NIDEK US-500）,respectively.The measured values collected by each device were statistically analyzed.Results　Mean CCT of 112 eyes by A ultrasound pachymetry，Tomey OA-2000 and IOL Master 700 were (542.23±26.88)μm,(521.75±26.51)μm and (519.53±28.15)μm,respectively.Univariate analysis of variance showed significant difference among the three devices (F=23.737,P<0.01) and between every two groups (both P＜0.05).CCT measured by A-ultrasound was thicker（20.48±8.16）μm than CCT measured by Tomey OA-2000,and the 95% confidence interval of the difference was 18.96 μm to 22.01 μm.CCT measured by A-ultrasound was（22.71±10.39）μm thicker than CCT measured by IOL Master 700,and the 95% confidence interval of the difference was 20.76 μm to 24.65 μm.Pearson correlation analysis showed that the measured values of the three instruments were highly correlated (all P＜0.01).Consistency analysis showed that the measured values of Tomey OA-2000 and IOL Master 700 were in better consistency than that of A ultrasound pachymetry.Conclusion　The results of CCT measured by Tomey OA-2000 and IOL Master 700 are well correlated and consistent than that measured by A ultrasound.However,there are slight differences in the results,so the three cannot simply replace each other.

参考文献/References:

［1］　CHEN Y G,DU Z Y,HU L J.Expert interpretation of excimer laser corneal refractive surgery［M］.Beijing:People’s Medical Publishing House,2007:40-41.
陈跃国,杜之渝,胡隆基.准分子激光角膜屈光手术专家释疑［M］.北京：人民卫生出版社,2007:40-41.
［2］　HUA Y J,XIAO Q Y,WU Q.Comparison of ocular variables obtained from Tomey OA-2000 and IOL Master［J］.Rec Adv Ophthalmol,2017,37(9):845-848.
华焱军,肖秋怡,吴强.新型眼生物测量仪Tomey OA-2000和IOL Master获得的白内障患者眼生物参数的比较［J］.眼科新进展,2017,37(9):845-848.
［3］　GOEBELS S,PATTMLLER M,EPPIG T,CAYLESS A,SEITZ B,LANGENBUCHER A.Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg,2015,41(11):2387-2393.
［4］　HUANG J H,GIACOMO S,WU F,YU X X,YANG J,YU A Y,et al.Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg,2015,41(11):2233-2241.
［5］　AKMAN A,ASENA L,GNGR S G.Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500［J］.Br J Ophthalmol,2016,100(9):1201-1205.
［6］　SHAJARI M,CREMONESE C,PETERMANN K,SINGH P,MLL-ER M,KOHNEN T.Comparison of axial length,corneal curvature,and anterior chamber depth measurements of 2 recently introduced devices to a known biometer［J］.Am J Ophthalmol,2017,178（1）:58-64.
［7］　MALDONADO M J,RUIZ OBLITAS L,MUNUERA J M,ALISEDA D,GARCA LAYANA A,MORENO MONTAS J.Optical coherence tomography evaluation of the corneal cap and stromal bed features after laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia and astigmatism［J］.Ophthalmology,2000,107(4):81-88.
［8］　HUA Y J,HUANG J H,WANG Q M.Clinical meaning of corneal thickness and progress of corneal pachymetry［J］.Int Eye Sci,2011,11(8):1376-1378.
华焱军,黄锦海,王勤美.角膜厚度的临床意义及测量方法进展［J］.国际眼科杂志,2011,11(8):1376-1378.
［9］　SONG G X.Ophthalmic imaging diagnosis［M］//LI F M,Chief editor.Chinese ophthalmology.Beijing:People’s Medical Publishing House Co,2005:706-745.
宋国祥.眼科影像诊断［M］//李凤鸣,主编.中华眼科学(上册).北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:706-745.
［10］　YANG J,LI R Z.Measurement methods and new development of corneal thickness［J］.Mod Med Health,2016,32(6):877-879.
杨俊,李瑞庄.角膜厚度常用测量方法及其新进展［J］.现代医药卫生,2016,32(6):877-879.
［11］　NAM S M,LEE H K,KIM E K,SEO K Y.Comparison of corneal thickness after the instillation of topical anesthetics:proparacaine versus oxybuprocaine［J］.Cornea,2006,25(1):51-54.
［12］　YE Y,SHEN Z W,YIN H,LI L,WU J T.Comparison of central corneal thickness in normal eyes before and aftert opical anes thesia with Pentacam scheimp flug system［J］.Rec Adv Ophthalmol,2011,31(1):68-70.
叶娅,沈政伟,尹禾,李丽,吴金桃.Pentacam系统测量正常人眼表面麻醉前后中央角膜厚度的对比研究［J］.眼科新进展,2011,31(1):68-70.
［13］　DU Z Y,CHEN Y,ZHANG D Y,ZHENG Q,GUO H.Corneal topographic analysis of ocular surfaces influence after using topical anesthetics［J］.Rec Adv Ophthalmol,2001,21(4):271-272.
杜之渝,陈曜,张大勇,郑晴,郭红.表面麻醉剂对眼表影响的地形图分析［J］.眼科新进展,2001,21(4):271-272.
［14］　PENG D,WANG Q M,CHEN S H.Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by three optical measurement deviceswith ultrasound pachymetry［J］.Int Eye Sci,2013,13(12):2545-2548.
彭铎,王勤美,陈世豪.三种光学测量仪器与A超对近视眼中央角膜厚度测量的对比研究［J］.国际眼科杂志,2013,13(12):2545-2548.
［15］　WONG A C,WONG C C,YUEN N S,HUI S P.Correlational study of central corneal thickness measurements on Hong Kong Chinese using optical coherence tomography,Orbscan and ultrasound pachymetry［J］.Eye,2002,16(6):715-721.
［16］　BECHMANN M,THIEL M J,NEUBAUER A S,ULLRICH S,LUDWIG K,KENYON K R.Central corneal thickness measurement with a retinal optical coherence tomography device versus standard ultrasonic pachymetry［J］.Cornea,2001,20(1):50-54.
［17］　ZHAO P S,WONG T Y,WONG W L,SAW S M,AUNG T.Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography with ultrasound pachymetry［J］.Ophthalmologe,2007,143(6):1047-1049.
［18］　ZHOU H M,JIA Y L,XIANG M H,LI Q S,TIAN W J,GAO X.Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by PachPen ultrasonic pachymetry and the other two optical measuring instruments［J］.Int Eye Sci,2018,18(4):709-712.
周欢明,贾元玲,项敏泓,李青松,田文杰,高翔.PachPen超声角膜测厚仪与两种光学测量仪器在中央角膜厚度测量中的对比［J］.国际眼科杂志,2018,18(4):709-712.
［19］　XU L J,ZHAO J,XIE L X,WU J,SUN D P.Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography,Visante optical coherence tomography and A ultrasound pachymetry［J］.Rec Adv Ophthalmol,2011,31(3):250-253.
徐玲娟,赵靖,谢立信,吴洁,孙大鹏.FD-OCT、Visante OCT及A超角膜测厚仪测量人中央角膜厚度的比较［J］.眼科新进展,2011,31(3):250-253.

相似文献/References:

[1]周琼 黄敬.盐酸丙美卡因滴眼液对兔眼中央角膜厚度及角膜上皮形态学的影响[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(7):000.
[2]汤勇 刘才远.LASIK、Epi-LASIK、SBK、Fem-LASIK及SMILE术中角膜切削误差的对比研究[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(9):000.
[3]孙宏霞 陶晨雯 刘苏冰 聂晓丽 买志彬 辛宝莉.四种方法测量近视患者中央角膜厚度的比较研究[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(9):000.
[4]郑江娉 廖敏华.不同手术方式对高度近视合并白内障患者中央角膜厚度及视觉质量的影响[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(10):000.
[5]张亦农. 抗青光眼术后中央角膜厚度变化及其与眼压的相关性研究[J].眼科新进展,2014,34(3):251.
[6]孙倩,周跃华.远视眼与近视眼角膜生物力学研究及眼压的比较[J].眼科新进展,2014,34(10):971.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2014.0269]
[7]郑彪,蔡艳霞,柯毅. 不同类型青光眼患者前部巩膜厚度与眼部生物学参数的相关性研究[J].眼科新进展,2015,35(2):177.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0048]
　ZHENG Biao,CAI Yan-Xia,KE Yi.Correlation between anterior sclera thickness and other ocular biological parameters in patients with different types of glaucoma[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2015,35(8):177.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0048]
[8]王明玥,肖伟,濮伟,等.婴儿先天性白内障摘出术后早期中央角膜厚度变化与眼压的相关性研究[J].眼科新进展,2015,35(10):931.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0254]
　WANG Ming-Yue,XIAO Wei,PU Wei,et al.Central corneal thickness changes of infantal congenital cataracts and its correlation with intraocular pressure following extraction surgery[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2015,35(8):931.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0254]
[9]任胜卫,庞辰久,孙飒,等.新型角膜内皮镜SP-1P检测中央角膜厚度的临床应用[J].眼科新进展,2019,39(4):336.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2019.0075]
　REN Sheng-Wei,PANG Chen-Jiu,SUN Sa,et al.Application of new corneal endoscope SP-1P in the measurement of central corneal thickness[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2019,39(8):336.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2019.0075]
[10]徐畅,宋籽浔,王明玥,等.白内障摘出联合人工晶状体（IOL）植入术及无晶状体眼行IOL二期植入术患儿术后眼前节结构特点[J].眼科新进展,2019,39(10):929.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2019.0211]
　XU Chang,SONG Zi-Xun,WANG Ming-Yue,et al.Anterior segmental biometry characteristics of children patients following cataract extraction combined with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation or secondary IOL implantation in aphakic eyes[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2019,39(8):929.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2019.0211]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-07-31