[1]乔利亚,李晓霞,顾铮,等.不同临床经验医师应用LOCSⅢ对晶状体混浊程度评分的一致性研究[J].眼科新进展,2018,38(7):669-672.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0157]
　QIAO Li-Ya,LI Xiao-Xia,GU Zheng,et al.Repeatability of Lens Opacity Classification System Ⅲ between physicians with different clinical experience[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2018,38(7):669-672.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0157]
点击复制

不同临床经验医师应用LOCSⅢ对晶状体混浊程度评分的一致性研究/HTML
分享到：

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2018年7期
页码:
669-672
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2018-07-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Repeatability of Lens Opacity Classification System Ⅲ between physicians with different clinical experience
作者:
乔利亚; 李晓霞; 顾铮; 简泠雪; 张烨; 蔡啸谷; 管征; 李思珍
100730　北京市，首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院北京同仁眼科中心，北京市眼科学与视觉科学重点实验室（乔利亚，张烨）；100730　北京市，首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院北京同仁眼科中心，北京市眼科学与视觉科学重点实验室，北京市眼科研究所（李晓霞，蔡啸谷，管征）；100027　北京市，首都医科大
Author(s):
QIAO Li-Ya; LI Xiao-Xia; GU Zheng; Catherine Jan; ZHANG Ye; CAI Xiao-Gu; GUAN Zheng; LI Si-Zhen
Beijing Tongren Eye Center,Beijing Tongren Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory;Beijing Tongren Eye Center,Beijing Tongren Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory,Beijing institute of Ophthalmology;Ophthalmology,Beijing Anzhen Hospital,Capital Medical University;School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences;Ophthalmology,Nanjing Tongren Hospital
关键词:
裂隙灯; 数码照片; LOCSⅢ晶状体评分; 一致性
Keywords:
slit lamp scoring; digital photos; LOCSⅢ lens scoring; repeatability
分类号:
R776.1
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0157
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　评价不同临床经验医师应用晶状体混浊分级系统（Lens Opacity Classification SystemⅢ，LOCSⅢ），基于裂隙灯及数码照片进行晶状体混浊程度评分的一致性。方法　从邯郸眼病研究5 a随访项目中，随机选取2012年11月至2012年12月现场调查受试者51人（102眼）。首先由受过LOCSⅢ评分培训的高年资眼科副主任医师（评分员A）于现场参照LOCSⅢ标准图片，在裂隙灯下对晶状体核混浊程度（nuclear opacity，NO）、核颜色（nuclear color，NC）、皮质性白内障（cortical cataract，C）、后囊膜下白内障（posterior subcapsular cataract，PSC）进行评分，随后采集晶状体数码照片。评分员A和1名眼科住院医师（评分员B）根据晶状体数码照片独立进行NO、NC、C、PSC评分。然后一位经过LOCSⅢ晶状体评分培训的白内障专业副主任医生对评分员B进行培训，同时与评分员A进行讨论并统一对LOCSⅢ标准评分方法的理解后，评分员B进行第2次评分。均采用组内相关系数（intraclass correlation coefficient，ICC）分别检验评分员A基于裂隙灯及数码照片的LOCSⅢ晶状体评分的一致性，评分员B培训前、后的LOCSⅢ晶状体评分的一致性，以及评分员B培训前、后的LOCSⅢ晶状体评分与评分员A基于裂隙灯及数码照片的LOCSⅢ晶状体评分进行一致性检验。结果　评分员A基于现场裂隙灯和晶状体数码照片的LOCSⅢ晶状体评分的ICC分别为：NO 0.89、NC 0.89、C 0.90、PSC 0.65；评分员B培训前、后LOCSⅢ晶状体评分ICC分别为：NO 0.90、NC 0.90、C 0.89、PSC 0.12；评分员B培训前、后基于数码照片与评分员A基于裂隙灯的LOCSⅢ晶状体评分ICC分别为NO 0.77、0.82，NC 0.79、0.85，C 0.77 、0.89，PSC 0.05、0.46；评分员B培训前、后与评分员A基于数码照片的LOCSⅢ晶状体评分比较ICC分别为：NO 0.83、0.81，NC 0.80、0.84，C 0.76 、0.88，PSC 0.26、0.85。结论　眼科临床经验对临床医师采用LOCSⅢ进行NO、NC、C评分影响不大，对PSC评分影响较大，而LOCSⅢ标准评分方法培训可以弥补眼科医师临床经验的不足，但不能提高基于裂隙灯和数码照片的LOCSⅢ对PSC评分的一致性。
Abstract:
Objective　To evaluate the repeatability of Lens Opacity Classification System Ⅲ（LOCSⅢ） based on slit lamp and digital photos，as well as between different clinical physicians.Methods　From November 2012 to December 2012，51 participants （102 eyes） were randomly selected from the five year follow-up study of Handan eye study.Firstly，a senior ophthalmologist （scorer A） graded lens nuclear opacities （NO），nuclear color （NC），cortical cataract （C） and posterior capsular cataract （PSC） under slit lamp on the scene，referring to the LOCSⅢ standard pictures.Then the lens digital photos were collected.The scorer A and one intern （scorer B） independently performed NO，NC，C and PSC scores according to the lens digital photographs.Then a cataract professional ophthalmologist，who was trained by the LOCSⅢ lens score training，trained the scorer B.After scorer A and B discussed and unified the LOCSⅢ standard scoring method，scorer B scored the lens digital photographs for the second time.Repeatability of the LOCSⅢ score of the scorer A based on slit lamp and digital photograph was evaluated.Repeatability of the LOCSⅢ score of the scorer B before and after training was evaluated.The LOCSⅢ score of the scorer B before and after training was also compared to the LOCS Ⅲ score of the scorer A based on slit lamp and digital photos.Results　Intraclass correlation coefficients （ICC） for the LOCSⅢ score of the scorer A based on digital photos and digital photos was 0.89 for NO and NC，0.90 for C and 0.65 for PSC.Intraclass correlation coefficients （ICC） for the LOCSⅢ score of the scorer B before and after training was 0.90 for NO and NC，0.89 for C and 0.12 for PSC.Intraclass correlation coefficients （ICC） for the LOCSⅢ score of the scorer B before training and the LOCSⅢ score of the scorer A based on slit lamp was 0.77 for NO，0.79 for NC，0.77 for C and 0.05 for PSC.After training，the ICC was 0.82 for NO，0.85 for NC，0.89 for C and 0.46 for PSC.Intraclass correlation coefficients （ICC） for the LOCSⅢ score of the scorer B after training and the LOCSⅢ score of the scorer A based on digital photos was 0.83 for NO，0.80 for NC，0.76 for C and 0.26 for PSC.After training，the ICC was 0.81 for NO，0.84 for NC，0.88 for C and 0.85 for PSC.Conclusion　Clinical experience has little effect on the NO，NC，and C scores using LOCSⅢ，but has great influence on the PSC score.After LOCSⅢ standard training，the accuracy of scoring on PSC could be improved，but the repeatability of PSC score based on the slit lamp and the digital photos did not improve.

参考文献/References:

［1］　WONG W L，LI X，LI J，CHENG C Y，LAMOUREUX E L，WANG J J，et al.Cataract conversion assessment using lens opacity classification system Ⅲ and Wisconsin cataract grading system［J］.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci，2013，54（1）：280-287.
［2］　COCHENER B，PATEL S R，GALLIOT F.Correlational analysis of objective and subjective measures of cataract quantification［J］.J Refract Surg，2016，32（2）：104-109.
［3］　GALLIOT F，PATEL S R，COCHENER B.Objective scatter index：working toward a new quantification of cataract［J］?J Refract Surg，2016，32（2）：96-102.
［4］　CHYLACK L T，Jr，WOLFE J K，SINGER D M，LESKE M C，BULLIMORE M A，BAILEY I L，et al.The Lens Opacities Classification System Ⅲ.The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group［J］.Arch Ophthalmol，1993，111（6）：831-836.
［5］　KARBASSI M，KHU P M，SINGER D M，CHYLACK L T，Jr.Evaluation of lens opacities classification system Ⅲ applied at the slitlamp［J］.Optom Vis Sci，1993，70（11）：923-928.
［6］　FUJISAWA K，SASAKI K，SHIBATA T，MASUYAMA M.Inter-observer agreement tests in cataract epidemiology surveys［J］.Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi，1991，95（9）：873-877.
［7］　SEAH S K，WONG T Y，FOSTER P J，NG T P，JOHNSON G J.Prevalence of lens opacity in Chinese residents of Singapore：the tanjong pagar survey［J］.Ophthalmology，2002，109（11）：2058-2064.
［8］　DUAN X R，LIANG Y B，WANG N L，WONG T Y，SUN L P，YANG X H，et al.Prevalence and associations of cataract in a rural Chinese adult population：the Handan Eye Study［J］.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol，2013，251（1）：203-212.
［9］　KIRWAN J F，VENTER L，STULTING A A，MURDOCH I E.LOCS Ⅲ examination at the slit lamp，do settings matter［J］?Ophthalmic Epidemiol，2003，10（4）：259-266.
［10］　MARAINI G，PASQUINI P，SPERDUTO R D，BONACINI M，CARRIERI M P，CORONA R，et al.The effect of cataract severity and morphology on the reliability of the Lens Opacities Classification System Ⅱ （LOCS Ⅱ）［J］.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci，1991，32（8）：2400-2403.
［11］　MARAINI G，PASQUINI P，TOMBA M C，BONACINI M，STAZI M A，ROSMINI F，et al.An independent evaluation of the Lens Opacities Classification System Ⅱ （LOCS Ⅱ）［J］.Ophthalmology，1989，96（5）：611-615.
［12］　TAN A C，LOON S C，CHOI H，THEAN L.Lens Opacities Classification System Ⅲ：cataract grading variability between junior and senior staff at a Singapore hospital［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg，2008，34（11）：1948-1952.
［13］　MAUSCHITZ M M，ROTH F，HOLZ F G，BRETELER M M B，FINGER R P.The impact of lens opacity on SD-OCT retinal nerve fiber layer and Bruch’s membrane opening measurements using the anatomical positioning system （APS）［J］.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci，2017，58（5）：2804-2809.
［14］　LIM D H，KIM T H，CHUNG E S，CHUNG T Y.Measurement of lens density using Scheimpflug imaging system as a screening test in the field of health examination for age-related cataract［J］.Brit J Ophthalmol，2015，99（2）：184-191.
［15］　DOMINGUEZ-VICENT A，BIRKELDH U，LAURELL C G，NILSON M，BRAUTASET R.Objective assessment of nuclear and cortical cataracts through scheimpflug images：Agreement with the LOCS Ⅲ scale［J］.PLoS One，2016，11（2）：e0149249.
［16］　ORTIZ D，ALIO J L，RUIZ-COLECHA J，OSER U.Grading nuclear cataract opacity by densitometry and objective optical analysis［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg，2008，34（8）：1345-1352.
［17］　DATILES M B，ANSARI R R，YOSHIDA J，BROWN H，ZAMBRANO A I，TIAN J，et al.Longitudinal study of age-related cataract using dynamic light scattering：loss of alpha-crystallin leads to nuclear cataract development［J］.Ophthalmology，2016，123（2）：248-254.
［18］　LEE J，KOH D，ONG C N.Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable［J］.Comput Biol Med，1989，19（1）：61-70.
［19］　MAGALHAES F P，COSTA E F，CARIELLO A J，RODRIGUES E B，HOFLING-LIMA A L.Comparative analysis of the nuclear lens opalescence by the Lens Opacities Classification System Ⅲ with nuclear density values provided by Oculus Pentacam：a cross-section study using Pentacam Nucleus Staging software［J］.Arq Bras Oftalmol，2011，74（2）：110-113.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-12