[1]王晴,张红,田芳,等.VERION数字导航系统测量角膜曲率和散光的可重复性及其与iTrace、Lenstar LS900、手动角膜曲率计检测结果的一致性研究[J].眼科新进展,2017,37(3):267-270.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0067]
　WANG Qing,ZHANG Hong,TIAN Fang,et al.Reproducibility of VERION Digital Guidance System and its comparability with iTrace,Lenstar LS900 and manual keratometer in measuring keratometry and astigmatism[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2017,37(3):267-270.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0067]
点击复制

VERION数字导航系统测量角膜曲率和散光的可重复性及其与iTrace、Lenstar LS900、手动角膜曲率计检测结果的一致性研究/HTML
分享到：

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2017年3期
页码:
267-270
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2017-03-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Reproducibility of VERION Digital Guidance System and its comparability with iTrace,Lenstar LS900 and manual keratometer in measuring keratometry and astigmatism
作者:
王晴; 张红; 田芳; 栗勇涛
300000　天津市，天津医科大学眼科临床学院 天津医科大学眼科医院
Author(s):
WANG Qing; ZHANG Hong; TIAN Fang; LI Yong-Tao
Clinical college of Ophthalmology,Tianjin Medical University,Eye Hospital of Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300000,China
关键词:
VERION; iTrace; Lenstar LS900; 手动角膜曲率计; 角膜曲率; 角膜散光; 可重复性; 一致性
Keywords:
VERION; iTrace; Lenstar LS900; manual keratometer; keratometry; reproducibility; comparability
分类号:
R772.2
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0067
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　分析VERION数字导航系统测量角膜曲率和散光的可重复性及其与iTrace、Lenstar LS900、手动角膜曲率计检测结果的一致性。方法　对62名年龄相关性白内障患者分别用上述四种仪器进行角膜生物测量，记录并分析陡峭轴角膜曲率（steep keratometry，Ks）、平坦轴角膜曲率（flat keratometry，Kf）、散光幅度、散光轴位、矢量参数J0和J45。分析VERION测量的可重复性，并比较VERION与其他三种仪器测量结果的一致性。结果　用组内相关系数（intraclass correlation coefficient，ICC）和克隆巴赫系数（Cronbach’s alpha，α）分别对Ks、Kf、散光幅度、散光轴位、J0以及J45做出分析，结果均大于0.9（均为P<0.001），提示VERION测量角膜曲率及散光的可重复性极好。VERION测量的Ks、散光幅度均高于iTrace（均为P<0.05），其余指标的差异无统计学意义（均为P>0.05）。Bland-Altman分析显示J0、J45及散光轴位的 95% LOA分别为（-0.31~0.35）D、（-0.25~0.31）D、-13.5°~12.3°。二者测量的散光轴位差小于10°者占总体的77%（48/62），在合并角膜散光大于1 D的患者中占91%（42/46）。VERION与Lenstar LS900测量结果仅J45差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），其余指标差异无统计学意义（均为P>0.05）。Bland-Altman分析发现J0、J45及散光轴位的 95% LOA分别为（-0.25~0.31）D、（-0.27~0.36）D、-13.5°~11.0°。二者测量的散光轴位差小于10°者占总体的85%（53/62），在合并角膜散光大于1 D的患者中占93%（43/46）。VERION与手动角膜曲率计检测的Kf、散光幅度差异有统计学意义（均为P<0.05），其余指标差异无统计学意义（均为P>0.05）。Bland-Altman分析显示J0、J45及散光轴位的 95% LOA分别为（-0.38~0.35）D、（-0.41~0.42）D、-12.6°~16.4°。二者测量的散光轴位差小于10°者占总体的81%（50/62），在合并角膜散光大于1 D的患者中占91%（42/46）。结论　VERION在测量角膜曲率及散光方面具有良好的可重复性。其与iTrace、Lenstar LS900和手动角膜曲率计在角膜曲率、散光幅度的测量方面一致性较好，但对散光轴位的测量差别较大。
Abstract:
Objective　To analyze the reproducibility of keratometry and astigmatism measured by the VERION Digital Guidance System and the comparability of VERION with iTrace,Lenstar LS900 and manual keratometer.Methods　The keratometry of 62 cataract patients were measured using four different devices.The steep keratometry (Ks),flat keratometry (Kf),astigmatic magnitude,astigmatic axis,cylinder at 0-degree meridian (vector component,J0) and cylinder at 45-degree meridian (vector component,J45) from each machine were recorded and analyzed.The three repeated measurements and the results of VERION system with other three devices were compared to analyze the reproducibility and comparability of VERION system.Results　Reproducibility:Intraclass correlation coefficients and Cronbach’s alpha values were higher than 0.9 for Ks,Kf,astigmatic magnitude,astigmatic axis,J0 and J45 measured by the VERION system (all P<0.001).Comparability:The results of Ks and magnitude of astigmatism of VERION were larger than the iTrace (all P<0.05) in the paired-samples t test.There was no statistical difference for the rest of parameters (all P>0.05).The Bland-Altman graphs revealed the 95% limits of agreement (LOA) of J0,J45 and the astigmatic axis between VERION and iTrace were（-0.31-0.35）D,（-0.25-0.31）D and -13.5°-12.3°,respectively;There was no statistical differences for all parameters except for J45 in the paired-samples t test between the VERION and Lenstar LS900 (all P>0.05).The Bland-Altman graphs revealed the 95% LOA of J0,J45 and the astigmatic axis were （-0.25-0.31）D,（-0.27-0.36）D and -13.5°-11.0°,respectively;There were statistical differences for the results of Kf and magnitude of astigmatism between the VERION and manual keratometer (all P<0.05).The Bland-Altman graphs revealed the 95% LOA of J0,J45 and the astigmatic axis between VERION and manual keratometer were（-0.38-0.35）D,（-0.41-0.42）D,-12.6°-16.4°,respectively.Conclusion　The VERION system is a reliable system for the measurement of keratometry and astigmatism.The keratometry and astigmatic magnitude of the VERION system have a good agreement with the iTrace,Lenstar LS900 and manual keratometer.However,the astigmatic axis measurements are significantly different among the four devices.

参考文献/References:

［1］　NEMETH G，SZALAI E，HASSAN Z，LIPECZ A，BERTA A，MODIS L JR.Repeatability data and agreement of keratometry with the VERION system compared to the IOLMaster［J］.J Refract Surg，2015，31（5）：333-337.
［2］　PRAKASH G，SRIVASTAVA D，CHOUDHURI S.A novel Hartman Shack-based topography system：repeatability and agreement for corneal power with Scheimpflug+Placido topographer and rotating prism auto-keratorefractor［J］.Int Ophthalmol，2015，33（6）：869-880.
［3］　CRAWFORD AZ，PATEL DV，MCGHEE CN.Comparison and repeatability of keratometric and corneal power measurements obtained by Orbscan II，Pentacam，and Galilei corneal tomography systems［J］.Am J Ophthalmol，2013，156（1）：53-60.
［4］　王虎杰，栗静，刘磊，李新宇，黎冬平，王恒.两种仪器测量近视患者角膜地形图的对比研究［J］.临床眼科杂志，2013，21（3）：260.
WANG HJ，LI J，LIU L，LI XY，LI DP，WANG H.Comparison of corneal topography measurement with two different instruments［J］.J Clin Ophthalmol，2013，21（3）：260.
［5］　李炳震，梁晨，冬雪川，孙岩秀，郝燕生.四种不同方法测量角膜曲率比较研究［J］.中国实用眼科杂志，2014，32（4）：450-455.
LI BZ，LIANG C，DONG XC，SUN YX，HAO YS.Comparison and evaluation of four different techniques of keratometric measurement［J］.Chin J Pract Ophthalmol，2014，32（4）：450-455.
［6］　BLAND JM，ALTMAN DG.Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement［J］.Lancet，1986，1（8476）：307-310.
［7］　THIBOS LN，WHEELER W，HORNER D.Power vectors：an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error［J］.Optom Vis Sci，1997，74（6）：367-375.
［8］　MEHDIZADEH M.Effect of axial length and keratometry measurement error on intraocular lens implant power prediction formulas in pediatric patients［J］.J AAPOS，2008，12（4）：425.
［9］　MUELLER A，THOMAS BC，AUFFARTH GU，HOLZER MP.Comparison of a new image-guided system versus partial coherence interferometry，Scheimpflug imaging，and optical low-coherence reflectometry devices：Keratometry and repeatability［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg，2016，42（5）：672-678.
［10］　MA JJ，TSENG SS.Simple method for accurate alignment in toric phakic intraocular lens implantation［J］.J Cataract Rrfract Surg，2008，43（10）1631-1636.
［11］　LAUSCHKE JL，LAWLESS M，SUTTON G，ROBERTS TV，HODGE C.Assessment of corneal curvature using VERION optical imaging system：a comparative study［J］.Clin Exp Ophthalmol，2016，44（5）：369-376.
［12］　SCHULTZ M，OBERHEIDE U，KERMANI O.Comparability of an image-guided system with other instruments in measuring corneal keratometry and astigmatism［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg，2016，42（6）：904-912.
［13］　ASENA L，GUNGOR SG，AKMAN A.Comparison of keratometric measurements obtained by the VERION Image Guided System with optical biometry and auto-keratorefractometer［J］.Int Ophthalmol，2016，34（1）：1-9.
［14］　ELHOFI AH，HELALY HA.Comparison between digital and manual marking for toric intraocular lenses：a randomized trial［J］.Medicine，2015，94（38）：e1618.

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-04-01