[1]陈慧琳,原公强,赵灿,等.进口角膜保护剂与国产角膜保护黏弹剂对眼科手术患者角膜上皮的保护作用和安全性的对比分析[J].眼科新进展,2022,42(3):214-217.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2022.0043]
　CHEN Huilin,YUAN Gongqiang,ZHAO Can,et al.Comparative analysis of the protective effect and safety of imported corneal protectors and domestic corneal protective viscoelastic agents on the corneal epithelium of patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2022,42(3):214-217.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2022.0043]
点击复制

进口角膜保护剂与国产角膜保护黏弹剂对眼科手术患者角膜上皮的保护作用和安全性的对比分析/HTML
分享到：

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
42卷
期数:
2022年3期
页码:
214-217
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2022-03-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative analysis of the protective effect and safety of imported corneal protectors and domestic corneal protective viscoelastic agents on the corneal epithelium of patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery
作者:
陈慧琳; 原公强; 赵灿; 李凤洁; 罗燕; 王婷
266000　山东省青岛市，青岛大学（陈慧琳）；250021　山东省济南市，山东第一医科大学附属眼科医院，山东第一医科大学（山东省医学科学院），山东省眼科研究所，山东省眼科学重点实验室-省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地（陈慧琳，原公强，赵灿，李凤洁，罗燕，王婷）
Author(s):
CHEN Huilin1; 2; YUAN Gongqiang2; ZHAO Can2; LI Fengjie2; LUO Yan2; WANG Ting2
1.Qingdao University,Qingdao 266000,Shandong Province,China
2. Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University,State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base,Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology,Shandong Eye Institute,Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences,Jinan 250021,Shandong Province,China
关键词:
角膜保护黏弹剂; 角膜保护剂; 临床试验; 保护作用; 安全性
Keywords:
corneal protective viscoelastic agents;  corneal protectors;  clinical trials;  protective effect;  safety
分类号:
R772.2
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2022.0043
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　对比分析进口角膜保护剂与国产角膜保护黏弹剂对眼科手术患者角膜上皮的保护作用和安全性。方法　选取2021年1月至7月在山东第一医科大学附属眼科医院拟行单眼白内障手术或眼底手术的患者52例（52眼）为研究对象。采用随机数字法将患者分为试验组和对照组，每组各26眼。试验组使用国产角膜保护黏弹剂，对照组使用波兰产角膜保护剂。主要保护作用评价指标为光学清晰度保持成功率,次要保护作用评价指标包括产品在术前、术后的保护剂眼表覆盖厚度、光学清晰度保持时间及光学清晰度评分。术前和术后对患者行泪膜破裂时间（TBUT）、泪液分泌试验（SIt）检查以及角膜荧光素钠染色（CFS）评分，并对产品安全性进行评价。结果　试验组和对照组的光学清晰度保持成功率分别为100.00%、96.15%，率差为3.85%（95%可信区间为-3.55%~11.24%）。两组患者术前和术后保护剂眼表覆盖厚度比较差异均无统计学意义（均为P>0.05）。两组患者光学清晰度保持时间、光学清晰度评分差异均无统计学意义（均为P>0.05）。两组患者术后1 d、7 d的TBUT及术后7 d的SIt，差异均无统计学意义（均为P>0.05）；试验组患者术后 1 d 的CFS评分高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），两组患者术后7 d的CFS评分，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。试验组和对照组不良事件发生率分别为34.62%（9/26）和26.92%（7/26），差异无统计学意义（P=0.349）。结论　国产角膜保护黏弹剂在防止术中因角膜干燥而导致的角膜上皮损伤方面安全有效，与已上市的进口角膜保护剂疗效相当。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare and analyze the protective effect and safety of imported corneal protectors and domestic corneal protective viscoelastic agents on the corneal epithelium of patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery.Methods　Totally 52 patients (52 eyes) who underwent monocular cataract surgery or fundus surgery at the Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University from January to July 2021 were selected in this study. They were randomly divided into the test group and the control group, with 26 eyes in each group. Patients in the test group used domestic corneal protective viscoelastic agents, while patients in the control group used Polish corneal protectors. In terms of the protective effect, the primary evaluation indicator was the success rate of optical clarity maintenance, and the secondary evaluation indicators included the thickness of the product’s preoperative and postoperative ocular surface coverage, optical clarity retention time, and optical clarity score. Tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer’s I test (SIt), and corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) were performed on patients before and after surgery, and the safety of the products was evaluated.Results　The success rate of optical clarity maintenance in the test and control groups were 100.00% and 96.15%, respectively, with a difference of 3.85 % (95% CI: -3.55% to 11.24%). There was no significant difference in the ocular surface covering thickness before and after surgery between the two groups (all P>0.05). The differences in the optical clarity retention time and optical clarity score between the two groups were insignificant (all P>0.05). TBUT at day 1 and 7 postoperatively and SIt on day 7 postoperatively showed no significant statistical difference between the two groups (all P>0.05). The CFS scores of patients in the test group were higher than those in the control group at 1 d after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference between the CFS scores of the two groups on day 7 postoperatively (P>0.05). The incidence of adverse events in the test and control groups was 34.62% (9/26) and 26.92 % (7/26), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.349).Conclusion　Domestic corneal protective viscoelastic agents are safe and effective in preventing intraoperative corneal epithelial damage due to corneal dryness and can be comparable to the imported corneal protectors in efficacy.

参考文献/References:

［1］　TUNDISI L L,MOSTAO G B,CARRICONDO P C,PETRI D.Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose:physicochemical properties and ocular drug delivery formulations［J］.Eur J Pharm Sci,2021,159:105736.
［2］　HE Y,LI J,ZHU J,JIE Y,WANG N,WANG J.The improvement of dry eye after cataract surgery by intraoperative using ophthalmic viscosurgical devices on the surface of cornea:The results of a consort-compliant randomized controlled trial［J］.Medicine,2017,96(50):e8940.
［3］　刘玉秀,姚晨,陈峰,陈启光,苏炳华.非劣性/等效性试验的样本含量估计及统计推断［J］.中国新药杂志,2003(5):371-376.
LIU Y X,YAO C,CHEN F,CHEN Q G,SU B H.Sample size estimation and statistical inference in noninferiority/equivalence trials［J］.Chin J New Drugs,2003(5):371-376.
［4］　KASETSUWAN N,SATITPITAKUL V,CHANGUL T A.Incidence and pattern of dry eye after cataract surgery［J］.PLoS One,2013,8(11):1932-6203.
［5］　CHO Y K,KIM M S.Dry eye after cataract surgery and associated intraoperative risk factors［J］.Korean J Ophthalmol,2009,23(2):65-73.
［6］　NISHIDA T,YAGI J,FUKUDA M,KUSUBE T,OTORI T.Spontaneous persistent epithelial defects after cataract surgery［J］.Cornea,1987,6(1):32-37.
［7］　LOHMANN A M,VAN BEST J A,DE KEIZER R J.Corneal metabolism and epithelial barrier function after cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation:a fluorophotometric study［J］.Int Ophthalmol,1995,19(4):225-233.
［8］　CHEN H F,YEUNG L,YANG K J,SUN C C.Persistent corneal epithelial defect after pars plana vitrectomy［J］.Retina,2016,36(1):148-155.
［9］　CHIANG W Y,LEE J J,KUO H K,CHEN Y H,CHEN C H,CHEN Y J,et al.Factors associated with corneal epithelial defects after pars plana vitrectomy［J］.Int Ophthalmol,2018,38(1):105-110.
［10］　俞晓宇,王丹丹,常平骏,谢佳璐,李璋亮,廉恒丽,等.角膜保护剂对白内障术后干眼的影响［J］.中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2017,19(4):236-242.
YU X Y,WANG D D,CHANG P J,XIE J L,LI Z L,LIAN H L,et al.The effect of three intraoperative corneal wetting solutions on dry eye after cataract surgery［J］.Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2017,19(4):236-242.
［11］　武慧超,杜守颖,陆洋,黎迎,李鹏跃,陈振振.药用辅料羟丙基甲基纤维素在制剂中的应用［J］.中国实验方剂学杂志,2013,19(17):360-365.
WU H C,DU S Y,LU Y,LI Y,LI P Y,CHEN Z Z.Application of pharmaceutical excipients hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose in preparation［J］.Chin J Exp Tradit Med Formul,2013,19(17):360-365.
［12］　VANTI G,WANG M,BERGONZI M C,ZHIDONG L,BILIA A R.Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose hydrogel of berberine chloride-loaded escinosomes:dermal absorption and biocompatibility［J］.Int J Biol Macromol,2020,164:232-241.
［13］　NANKIVIL D,GONZALEZ A,ARRIETA E,ROWAAN C,AGUILAR M C,SOTOLONGO K,et al.A new,specular reflection-based,precorneal tear film stability measurement technique in a rabbit model:viscoelastic increases tear film stability［J］.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2014,55(7):4158-4163.
［14］　周凌霄,邵蕾,周金琼,魏文斌.角膜保护剂在玻璃体视网膜手术中的应用价值观察［J］.临床眼科杂志,2017,25(5):447-449.
ZHOU L X,SHAO L,ZHOU J Q,WEI W B.Value of cornea protection during vitreoretinal surgery［J］.J Clin Ophthalmol,2017,25(5):447-449.
［15］　邓明辉,冯雪亮.羟丙基甲基纤维素在超声乳化术中角膜的保护作用［J］.中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2018,40(6):449-451.
DENG M H,FENG X L.Protective effect of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose on corneal epithelium during phacoemulsification［J］.Chin J Ocul Traum Occupat Eye Dis,2018,40(6):449-451.
［16］　KWON S H,SHIN J P,KIM I T,PARK D H.Comparative study of corneal wetting agents during 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery under a noncontact wide-angle viewing system［J］.Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina,2013,44(4):360-365.
［17］　ARSHINOFF S A,KHOURY E.HsS versus a balanced salt solution as a corneal wetting agent during routine cataract extraction and lens implantation［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg,1997,23(8):1221-1225.
［18］　李彬,王晶,张苗苗.角膜保护剂在白内障手术中应用的研究［J］.中国实用眼科杂志,2016,34(2):164-166.
LI B,WANG J,ZHANG M M.Study on the use of cornea protective agent during cataract surgery［J］.Chin J Pract Ophthalmol,2016,34(2):164-166.
［19］　LING T,OTHMAN K,YAN O P,RASHID R A,TET C M,YAAKOB A,et al.Evaluation of ocular surface disease in Asian patients with primary angle closure［J］.Open Ophthalmol J,2017,11:31-39.
［20］　BRON A J,ARGESO P,IRKEC M,BRIGHT F V.Clinical staining of the ocular surface:mechanisms and interpretations［J］.Prog Retin Eye Res,2015,44:36-61.
［21］　高健铭.全角膜上皮缺损的临床愈合［J］.中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志,1996(2):25-26.
GAO J M.Clinical healing after pan-corneal epithelium abrasion［J］.Chin J Ophthalmol Otorhinolaryngol,1996(2):25-26.
［22］　俞学群,曹国平.玻璃体切割术后高眼压的发生率和特点及相关危险因素分析［J］.国际眼科杂志,2015,15(5):853-855.
YU X Q,CAO G P.Analysis of incidence rate,characteristics and related risk factors of high intraocular pressure after pars plana vitrectomy［J］.Int Eye Sci,2015,15(5):853-855.
［23］　周林,姚进.增殖性糖尿病性视网膜病变玻璃体切割术后高眼压的研究［J］.眼科新进展,2015,35(1):74-77.
ZHOU L,YAO J.Study on secondary ocular hypertension after vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy［J］.Rec Adv Ophthalmol,2015,35(1):74-77.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金区域创新发展联合基金（编号：U20A20386）；山东省自然科学基金（编号：ZR2019MH135）
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-03-05