[1]李杰,刘三梅,李芳,等.27G与25G微创玻璃体切割术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的对比分析[J].眼科新进展,2018,38(11):1050-1054.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0247]
　LI Jie,LIU San-Mei,LI Fang,et al.Retrospective comparison of 27-gauge and 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery for the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2018,38(11):1050-1054.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0247]
点击复制

27G与25G微创玻璃体切割术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的对比分析/HTML
分享到：

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2018年11期
页码:
1050-1054
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2018-11-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Retrospective comparison of 27-gauge and 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery for the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
作者:
李杰; 刘三梅; 李芳; 董文韬; 钟捷
610072　四川省成都市，四川医学科学院，四川省人民医院，电子科技大学医学院
Author(s):
LI Jie; LIU San-Mei; LI Fang; DONG Wen-Tao; ZHONG Jie
Department of Ophthalmology，Sichuan Academy of Medical Science & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital；School of Medicine，University of Electronic Science and Technology of China，Chengdu 610072，Sichuan Province，China
关键词:
27G; 25G; 微创玻璃体切割术; 原发性孔源性视网膜脱离
Keywords:
27-gauge; 25-gauge; microincision vitrectomy surgery; primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
分类号:
R774.1
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0247
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　对比分析27G与25G微创玻璃体切割术（pars plana vitrectomy，PPV）治疗原发性孔源性视网膜脱离（rhegmatogenous retinal detachment，RRD）效果，并探讨27G PPV治疗RRD的安全性及有效性。方法　回顾分析2015 年5 月至2017 年6 月我院开展的微创PPV治疗RRD患者共92例，其中25G组58例，27G组34例。对比分析两组手术时间、视网膜复位率、视力改善及并发症等。结果　25G组手术时间为（56.7±35.9）min，27G组为（55.7±36.1）min（F=0.049，P=0.852）。单次手术视网膜复位率，25G组为94.8%，27G为91.2%，差异无统计学意义（P=0.666）。25G组与27G组末次随访最佳矫正视力（best corrected visual acuity，BCVA）均较术前改善，两组间视力改善率（改善＞0.2 LogMAR）差异无统计学意义（χ2=1.860，P=0.173）。两组均无严重并发症发生。25G组有2眼（3.4%）发生医源性视网膜裂孔，27G组有1眼（2.9%）发生医源性视网膜裂孔。术后一周内，高眼压（>25 mmHg）（1 kPa=7.5 mmHg）发生率25G组为25.9%，27G组为11.8%（χ2=3.009，P=0.083）。两组均未观察到感染性眼内炎、脉络膜脱离等严重并发症。结论　27G微创PPV在手术时间、视网膜复位率、视力改善及并发症方面与25G微创PPV无显著差异。27G微创PPV是治疗RRD的安全有效的手术方式。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the 27-gauge (27G) microincision pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with the 25G PPV for treating primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and evaluate its safety and effectiveness.Methods　We retrospectively reviewed ninety-two eyes of 92 patients with RRD undergone PPV from May 2015 to June 2017.Fifty-eight eyes underwent 25G vitrectomy and 34 eyes for 27G vitrectomy,respectively.The analysis included the surgical time,the rate of reattachment of retina,improvement of visual acuity and the rate of complications.Results　The mean surgical times was (56.7±35.9)min for the 25G group and (55.7±36.1)min for the 27G group (F=0.049,P=0.852).The primary anatomical success rate after a single operation was 94.8% and 91.2% for 25G group and 27G group,respectively (P=0.666).The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the last visit increased significantly in both groups,but there was no significant differences in terms of visual improvement (>0.2 logMAR) ratio between the two groups (χ2=1.860,P=0.173).No severe intraoperative complication was observed.Iatrogenic retinal breaks occurred in 2 eyes (3.4%) in the 25G group and 1 eye (2.9%) in the 27G group.The transient ocular hypertension (>25 mmHg,1 kPa=7.5 mmHg) within 1 week postoperatively was 25.9% in 25G group,and 11.8% in 27G group,respectively (χ2=3.009,P=0.083).No complication such as endophthalmitis and choroidal detachment was observed in both groups.Conclusion　This study finds no significant differences in the surgical time,the rate of reattachment of retina,improvement of BCVA and complications between the 27G and the 25G vitrectomy.27G vitrectomy appears to be a safe and effective surgery for the treatment of primary RRD.

参考文献/References:

［1］　MACHEMER R，BUETTNER H，NORTON E W，PAREL J M.Vitrectomy：a pars plana approach［J］.Trans-Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol，1971，75(4)：813-820.
［2］　FUJII G Y，DE JUAN E，HUMAYUN M S，PIERAMICI D J，CHANG T S，AWH C，et al.A new 25-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy surgery［J］.Ophthalmology，2002，109(10)：1807-1812.
［3］　ECKARDT C.Transconjunctival sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy［J］.Retina，2005，25(2)：208-211.
［4］　RIZZO S，GENOVESI-EBERT F，MURRI S，BELTING C，VENTO A，CRESTI F，et al.25-gauge，sutureless vitrectomy and standard 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy in idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery：a comparative pilot study［J］.Graefes Arch Clin Exp，2006，244(4)：472-479.
［5］　OSHIMA Y，WAKABAYASHI T，SATO T，OHJI M，TANO Y.A 27-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless microincision vitrectomy surgery［J］.Ophthalmology，2010，117(1)：93-102.
［6］　MITSUI K，KOGO J，TAKEDA H，SHIONO A，SASAKI H，MUNEMASA Y，et al.Comparative study of 27-gauge vs 25-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane［J］.Eye，2016，30(4)：538-544.
［7］　KHAN M A，SHAHLAEE A，TOUSSAINT B，HSU J，SIVALINGAM A，DUGEL P U，et al.Outcomes of 27 gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery for posterior segment disease［J］.Am J Ophthalmol，2016，161(36)：31-32.
［8］　RIZZO S，BARCA F，CAPOROSSI T，MARIOTTI C.Twenty-seven-gauge vitrectomy for various vitreoretinal diseases［J］.Retina，2015，35(6)：1273-1278.
［9］　TOYGAR O，MI C W，MILLER D M，RIEMANN C D.Outcomes of transconjunctival sutureless 27-gauge vitrectomy with silicone oil infusion［J］.Graefes Arch Clin Exp，2016，254(11)：2111-2118.
［10］　ROMANO M R，CENNAMO G，FERRARA M，CENNAMO M，CENNAMO G.Twenty-seven-gauge versus 25-gauge vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment［J］.Retina，2016，37(4)：637-642.
［11］　SHAHZADI B，RIZWI SF，QURESHI F M，LATIF K，MAHMOOD S A.Outcomes of transconjunctival sutureless 27-gauge micro-incision vitrectomy surgery in diabetic vitreous haemorrhage［J］.Pak J Med Sci，2017，33(1)：86-89.
［12］　ZHANG Z，WEI Y，JIANG X，ZHANG S.Surgical outcomes of 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with short-term postoperative tamponade of perfluorocarbon liquid for repair of giant retinal tears［J］.Int J Ophthalmol，2017,11：1-9.
［13］　RIZZO S，POLIZZI S，BARCA F，CAPOROSSI T，VIRGILI G.Comparative study of 27-gauge versus 25-gauge vitrectomy for the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment［J］.J Ophthalmol，2017,(4)：1-5.
［14］　KUNIKATA H，NISHIDA K.Visual outcome and complications of 25-gauge vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment，84 consecutive cases［J］.Eye，2010，24(6)：1071-1077.
［15］　ABULON D J K，BUBOLTZ D C.Performance comparison of high-speed dual-pneumatic vitrectomy cutters during simulated vitrectomy with balanced salt solution［J］.Transl Vis Sci Techn，2015，4(1)：6-6.
［16］　OSAWA S，OSHIMA Y.27-gauge vitrectomy［J］.Dev Ophthalmol，2014，54：54-62.
［17］　LAKHANPAL R R，HUMAYUN M S，DE JUAN EJR.，LIM J I，CHONG L P，CHANG T S，et al.Outcomes of 140 consecutive cases of 25-gauge transconjunctival surgery for posterior segment disease［J］.Ophthalmology，2005，112(5)：817-824.
［18］　YONEDA K，MORIKAWA K，OSHIMA Y，KINOSHITA S，SOTOZONO C.Surgical outcomes of 27-gauge vitrectomy for a consecutive series of 163 eyes with various vitreous diseases［J］.Retina，2017，37 (11)：2130-2137
［19］　LAI M M，RUBY AJ，SARRAFIZADEH R，URBAN K E，HASSAN T S，DRENSER K A，et al.Repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy［J］.Retina，2008，28(5)：729-734.
［20］　KAPRAN Z，ACAR N，ALTAN T，UNVER Y B，Yurttaser S.25-gauge sutureless vitrectomy with oblique sclerotomies for the management of retinal detachment in pseudophakic and phakic eyes［J］.Eur J Ophthalmol，2009，19(5)：853-860.
［21］　ACAR N，KAPRAN Z，ALTAN T，UNVER Y B，YURTSEVER S，KUCUKSUMER Y.Primary 25-gauge sutureless vitrectomy with oblique sclerotomies in pseudophakic retinal detachment［J］.Retina，2008，28(8)：1068-1074.
［22］　ROMANO M R，SCOTTI F，VINCIGUERRA P.27-Gauge vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment：Is it feasible［J］?Ann Acad Med Singap，2015，44(5)：185-187.

相似文献/References:

[1]张楠 孙晓萍 高延庆 孙新霞.23G TVS与25G TVS治疗复杂性孔源性视网膜脱离的临床疗效观察[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(1):000.
[2]毛新帮 游志鹏 赵菊莲.应用25G经结膜无缝合玻璃体切割系统治疗特发性黄斑前膜[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(3):000.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金项目（编号：81700841）
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-10-30