[1]余婷,叶芬,施宇华,等.睑板腺功能障碍患者的视觉质量分析[J].眼科新进展,2017,37(10):966-969.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0245]
　YU Ting,YE Fen,SHI Yu-Hua,et al.Evaluation of visual quality in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2017,37(10):966-969.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0245]
点击复制

睑板腺功能障碍患者的视觉质量分析/HTML
分享到：

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2017年10期
页码:
966-969
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2017-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation of visual quality in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction
作者:
余婷; 叶芬; 施宇华; 曹茜; 黄振平
210000　江苏省南京市，南京总医院眼科
Author(s):
YU Ting; YE Fen; SHI Yu-Hua; CAO Qian; HUANG Zhen-Ping
Department of Ophthalmology，Nanjing General Hospital，Nanjing 210000，Jiangsu Province，China
关键词:
睑板腺功能障碍; 干眼; 视觉质量; 双通道技术
Keywords:
meibomian gland dysfunction; dry eye; optical quality; double-pass technique
分类号:
R777.1
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0245
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　运用双通道视觉质量分析仪（optical quality analysis system，OQAS-Ⅱ）观察睑板腺功能障碍（meibomian gland dysfunction，MGD）患者的视觉质量，为其临床应用提供依据。方法　50例（50眼）MGD患者按照是否伴随干眼症状分为MGD干眼组（22眼）和MGD非干眼组（28眼），同时选取25名（25眼）健康志愿者为对照组。利用OQAS-Ⅱ检测并比较3组受试者自然状态下的视觉质量：调制传递函数截止频率（modulation transfer function cutoff，MTF cutoff）、斯特列尔比值（Strehl ratio，SR）、客观散射指数（objective scattering index，OSI）。所有受试对象均行睑板腺相关检查（睑缘形态评分、睑板腺挤压评分、睑板腺分泌物性状评分）和泪液相关检查。对3组受试对象的测量结果进行比较，同时检测指标间的相关性。结果　3组受试对象的MTF cutoff、SR、OSI差异均有统计学意义（均为P＜0.05）。MGD非干眼组的MTF cutoff和SR分别为（31.36±1.83）c·deg-1和0.21±0.02，均较对照组的（35.87±1.59）c·deg-1和0.23±0.03显著降低，OSI为0.57±0.06，较对照组的0.45±0.06显著提高（均为P＜0.05）；MGD干眼组的MTF cutoff和SR分别为（27.87±3.08）c·deg-1和0.16±0.02，均较MGD非干眼组显著降低，OSI为0.72±0.10，较MGD非干眼组显著提高（均为P＜0.05）。MGD患者的OSI、MTF cutoff、SR与泪膜破裂时间、泪液分泌量、睑板腺相关检查数据间均无相关性（均为P>0.05）。结论　OQAS-Ⅱ检测发现MGD患者的视觉质量参数发生变化，且MGD干眼患者较MGD非干眼患者变化更明显。MGD非干眼患者视觉质量的下降应当引起临床医师的重视。
Abstract:
Objective　To evaluate the optical quality in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) by using double-pass optical quality analysis system (OQAS-Ⅱ) for offering the reference data for clinical practices.Methods　A total of 50 patients with a diagnosis of MGD，who were divided into MGD with dry eye disease (DED) group (n=22) and MGD without DED group (n=28) according to the results of tear film break-up time (BUT) and Schirmer Ⅰ test (S Ⅰ T)，and another 25 healthy subjects were enrolled in this study.Then several parameters，including modulation transfer function cutoff (MTF cutoff)，Strehl ratio (SR) and objective scattering index (OSI)，were measured to evaluate the optical quality by using OQAS-Ⅱ.Additional clinical examination，including meibomian gland and tear film assessment were performed and compared between the three groups.In addition，a correlation analysis was conducted among OSI，MTF cutoff，SR，BUT，S Ⅰ T and meibomian gland assessment.Results　Statistical differences were approached in MTF cutoff，SR，OSI of the three groups (all P<0.05).The MTF cutoff and SR in MGD without DED group were significantly lower than those in the control group ［(31.36±1.83)c·deg-1 vs.(35.87 ±1.59)c·deg-1，(0.21±0.02) vs.(0.23±0.03)］，but the OSI got higher ［(0.57±0.06) vs.(0.45±0.06)］ (all P<0.05).The SR and MTF cutoff in MGD patients with DED was significantly lower than those in MGD patients without DED ［(27.87±3.08) c·deg-1 vs.(31.36±1.83)c·deg-1，(0.16±0.02) vs.(0.21 ± 0.02)］，but OSI got significantly higher ［(0.72±0.10) vs.(0.57±0.06)］(all P<0.05).Among the three groups，OSI，MTF cutoff and SR showed no significant correlation with BUT，S Ⅰ T and meibomian gland assessment (all P>0.05).Conclusion　There is changes in visual quality parameters in MGD patients by OQAS-Ⅱ，and MGD with DED patients has significant changes than MGD patients without DED.

参考文献/References:

［1］　FOULKS GN，BRON AJ.Meibomian gland dysfunction：a clinical scheme for description，diagnosis，classification，and grading［J］.Ocul Surf，2003，1（3）：107-126.
［2］　赵小云，黄悦，赵少贞，张未娟，张文静.先天性近视豚鼠眼球生物学参数及巩膜病理改变［J］.新乡医学院学报，2017，34（6）：465-468.
ZHAO XY，HUANG Y，ZHAO SZ，ZHANG WJ，ZHANG WJ.Biological parameters and the sclera pathological changes in congenital myopia guinea pigs［J］.J Xinxiang Med Univ，2017，34（6）：465-468.
［3］　QAZI Y，KHEIRKHAH A，BLACKIE C，BLACKIE C，CRUZAT A，TRINIDAD M，et al.In vivo detection of clinically non-apparent ocular surface inflammation in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction-associated refractory dry eye symptoms：a pilot study［J］.Eye （Lond），2015，29（8）：1099-1110.
［4］　MARTNEZ-RODA JA，VILASECA M，ONDATEGUI JC，ALMUDI L，ASAAD M，MATEOS-PENA L，et al.Double-pass technique and compensation-comparison method in eyes with cataract［J］.J Cataract Refract Surg，2016，42（10）：1461-1469.
［5］　TOMLINSON A，BRON AJ，KORB DR，AMANO S，PAUGH JR，PEARCE EI，et al.The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction：report of the diagnosis subcommittee［J］.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci，2011，52（4）：2006-2049.
［6］　BHAVSAR AS，BHAVSAR SG，JAIN SM.A review on recent advances in dry eye：Pathogenesis and management［J］.Oman J Ophthalmol，2011，4（2）：50-56.
［7］　MC CULLEY JP，SHINE WE.The lipid layer of tears：dependent on meibomian gland function［J］.Exp Eye Res，2004，78（3）：361- 365.
［8］　SORIA J，DURAN JA，ETXEBARRIA J，MERAYO J，GONZALEZ N，REIGADA R，et al.Tear proteome and protein network analyses reveal a novel pentamarker panel for tear film characterization in dry eye and meibomian gland dysfunction［J］.J Proteomics，2013，78（14）：94-112.
［9］　TSUBOT A，GOTO E，ONO M.SHIMMURA S，TSUBOTA K.Meibomian gland dysfunction in patients with Sjgren syndrome［J］.Ophthalmology，1998，105（8）：1485-1488.
［10］　PUJOL J，GISPETS J，ARJONA M.Optical performance in eyes wearing two multifocal contact lenses design［J］.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt，2003，23（4）：347-360.
［11］　GUIRAO A，REDONDO M，GERAGHTY E，PIERS P，NORRBY S，ARTAL P.Corneal optical aberrations and retinal image quality in patients in whom monofocal intraocular lenses were implanted［J］.Arch Ophthalmol，2002，120（9）：1143-1151.
［12］　BAUDOUIN C，MESSMER EM，ARAGONA P，GEERLING G，AKOVA YA，Benitez-del-Castillo J，et al.Revisiting the vicious circle of dry eye disease：a focus on the pathophysiology of meibomian gland dysfunction［J］.Br J Ophthalmol，2016，100（3）：300-306.
［13］　ARCINIEGA JC，NADJI EJ，BUTOVICH IA.Effects of free fatty acids on meibomian lipid films［J］.Exp Eye Res，2011，93（4）：452-459.
［14］　MUDGIL P，BORCHMAN D，YAPPERT MC，DURAN D，COX GW，SMITH RJ，et al.Lipid order，saturation and surface property relationships：a study of human meibum saturation［J］.Exp Eye Res，2013，116（11）：79-85.
［15］　杜伟峰，安美霞，覃莉莉，轩亚玲，王丽莉，叶琳，等.睑板腺功能障碍与分泌物和泪液中前列腺素E2含量的关系［J］.国际眼科杂志，2016，16（5）：990-992.
DU WF，AN MX，QIN LL，XUAN YL，WANG LL，YE L，et al.Relation between meibomian gland dysfunction and the content of prostaglandin E2 in the secretions and tears［J］.Int Eye Sci，2016，16（5）：990-992.

相似文献/References:

[1]姜洋 李莹 王忠海 罗岩 金玉梅.小牛血去蛋白提取物眼用凝胶对LASIK 术后角膜修复及干眼的疗效观察[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(7):000.
[2]叶芬 王春红 陈银 施宇华 黄振平.人工泪液对糖尿病干眼患者泪河的影响[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(12):000.
[3]张磊 何彦津.无眼征Graves病患者的眼表损害[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(12):000.
[4]张宏 马俊旗 安晓 叶向彧.围绝经期干眼患者眼表CXCR3表达与性激素的相关性分析[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(9):000.
[5]谭业双 周霞 许 玲 王玲丽 樊玲.抗炎治疗睑板腺功能障碍的临床研究[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(1):000.
[6]叶芬 田农 施宇华 薛春燕 黄振平.糖尿病干眼患者的波前像差分析[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(4):000.
[7]魏瑞华 郝永娜 赵少贞.自身免疫相关性干眼动物模型的研究进展[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(7):000.
[8]魏瑞华 郝永娜 边领斋 李雪 粘红 赵少贞.Sjogren综合征相关性干眼发病机制的研究进展[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(3):000.
[9]邱伟强 李学民 王薇 刘子源 张志红.泪点栓塞和人工泪液对干眼患者视功能和泪膜稳定性的影响[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(10):000.
[10]毛祖红 王乐 邵毅 张广斌 叶向彧 陈乐磊 董诺.不同方位切口对角膜神经损伤及泪膜功能影响相关性研究[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(12):000.
[11]皮百木 穆红梅 张婉婷 郑娜 李娟.老年干眼患者眼表改变及其与睑板腺功能障碍的相关性[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(6):000.
[12]李妍,桑璇,王晓然,等.干眼患者泪膜脂质层厚度检测及其与眼表体征的相关性分析[J].眼科新进展,2017,37(4):344.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0087]
　LI Yan,SANG Xuan,WANG Xiao-Ran,et al.Measurement of tear film lipid layer thickness in dry eye patients and its relationship with ocular surface signs[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2017,37(10):344.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0087]
[13]袁媛.干眼危险因素的研究[J].眼科新进展,2017,37(12):1173.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0296]
　YUAN Yuan.Risk factors for dry eye[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2017,37(10):1173.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0296]

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-10-24