[1]唐秀侠,买志彬,聂晓丽,等.电脑验光仪、IOLMaster、LenstarLS900测量角膜曲率的对比分析[J].眼科新进展,2014,34(11):1081-1082.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2014.0300]
 TANG Xiu-Xia,MAI Zhi-Bin,NIE Xiao-Li,et al.Comparison of corneal curvature measured by auto-refractometer ,IOL master , and Lenstar LS900[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2014,34(11):1081-1082.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2014.0300]
点击复制

电脑验光仪、IOLMaster、LenstarLS900测量角膜曲率的对比分析
分享到:

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2014年11期
页码:
1081-1082
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2014-11-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of corneal curvature measured by auto-refractometer ,IOL master , and Lenstar LS900
作者:
唐秀侠买志彬聂晓丽刘苏冰江红玲
450052 河南省郑州市,武警河南总队医院眼科
Author(s):
TANG Xiu-XiaMAI Zhi-Bin NIE Xiao-Li LIU Su-Bing JIANG Hong-Ling
关键词:
电脑验光仪IOLmasterLenstarLS900角膜曲率
Keywords:
auto-refractometer IOL master Lenstar LS900 corneal curvature
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2014.0300
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较电脑验光仪、IOLMaster、LenstarLS900三种仪器测量角膜曲率的差异性,并为临床提供数据参考。方法 利用三种不同测量仪器对86例(172眼)患者测量垂直与水平角膜曲率,每种仪器每眼分别测量三次,由专人负责测量,记录其平均值。结果 电脑验光仪测得垂直曲率为(43.85±1.74)D、水平曲率为(43.08±1.39)D,IOLMaster测得垂直曲率为(4408±2.78)D、水平曲率为(42.92±1.43)D,LenstarLS900测得垂直曲率为(43.91±1.69)D,水平曲率为(42.94±1.41)D。三者测出的结果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 通过对同一人群不同仪器测量角膜曲率的结果进行分析显示,三种仪器测量出的角膜曲率数据均准确可靠,一致性较好,可以相互替代使用。
Abstract:
Objective To compare differences of corneal curvature measured by auto- refractometer . IOL master. and Lenstar LS900 in clinical application. Methods The vertical and horizontal corneal curvature in 86 cases ( 172 eyes) were measured by three kinds of instruments , every eye was measured three times by one instrument , one person was responsible for one instrument, the average of three values was recorded. Results The vertical curvature measured by auto-refractometer ,IOLmaster , and LenstarLS900 were (43. 85 + 1. 74 ) D, ( 44. 08 + 2. 78 ) D and ( 43. 91 + 1. 69 ) D , respectively, the horizontal curvature were ( 43. 08 + 1. 39) D , ( 42. 92 + 1. 43 ) D and (42. 94 + 1. 40 ) D , respectively. The differences was not statistical significant ( all P > 0. 05 ) . Conclusion By comparing clinical observation of different instruments in measuring corneal curvature.the three instruments are accurate, reliable and consistent in measuring corneal curvature , and they can be substituted by each other.

相似文献/References:

[1]郭琳,马波. IOLMaster、角膜地形图及Pentacam测量年龄相关性白内障患者角膜散光的比较[J].眼科新进展,2014,34(9):868.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2014.0240]
[2]华焱军,肖秋怡,吴强.新型眼生物测量仪Tomey OA-2000和IOLMaster获得的白内障患者眼生物参数的比较[J].眼科新进展,2017,37(9):845.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0214]
 HUA Yan-Jun,XIAO Qiu-Yi,WU Qiang.Comparison of ocular variables obtained from Tomey OA-2000 and IOLMaster[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2017,37(11):845.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0214]
[3]霍敏灼,梁先军,何锦贤,等.数码裂隙灯照相系统、数显卡尺、Pentacam眼前节分析系统及IOLMaster测量角膜水平直径的比较[J].眼科新进展,2018,38(10):986.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0233]
 HUO Min-Zhuo,LIANG Xian-Jun,HE Jin-Xian,et al.Comparison of the measurement of corneal horizontal diameter by digital slit-lamp photographic system,digital caliper,Pentacam and IOLMaster[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2018,38(11):986.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0233]

更新日期/Last Update: 2014-11-11