[1]陈源,陈海英,项晓丽,等.白内障摘出联合睫状体光凝或小梁切除术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼效果及对眼表的影响[J].眼科新进展,2021,41(7):660-663.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0136]
 CHEN Yuan,CHEN Haiying,XIANG Xiaoli,et al.Comparison of curative effect and ocular surface changes after cyclophotocoagulation or trabeculectomy combined with cataract surgery for primary angle closure glaucoma[J].Recent Advances in Ophthalmology,2021,41(7):660-663.[doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0136]
点击复制

白内障摘出联合睫状体光凝或小梁切除术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼效果及对眼表的影响/HTML
分享到:

《眼科新进展》[ISSN:1003-5141/CN:41-1105/R]

卷:
41卷
期数:
2021年7期
页码:
660-663
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2021-07-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of curative effect and ocular surface changes after cyclophotocoagulation or trabeculectomy combined with cataract surgery for primary angle closure glaucoma
作者:
陈源陈海英项晓丽陈可俞晶晶黄正如
215500 江苏省常熟市,常熟市第二人民医院眼科
Author(s):
CHEN YuanCHEN HaiyingXIANG XiaoliCHEN KeYU JingjingHUANG Zhengru
Department of Opthalmology,Changshu No.2 People’s Hospital,Changshu 215500,Jiangsu Province,China
关键词:
青光眼 白内障白内障手术小梁切除术睫状体光凝术眼压眼表
Keywords:
glaucoma cataract cataract surgery trabeculectomy cyclophotocoagulation intraocular pressure ocular surface
分类号:
R775
DOI:
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2021.0136
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较晶状体超声乳化术联合睫状体光凝术(CPC)或晶状体超声乳化术联合小梁切除术(CPT)治疗原发性闭角型青光眼(PACG)的效果及对眼表的影响。方法 纳入合并白内障行手术治疗的PACG患者101例(101眼),并根据接受手术方式的不同分为两组:CPC组患者接受CPC,共46例(46眼);CPT组接受CPT,共55例(55眼)。两组均以术眼的对侧眼为组内自身对照。收集入院时及术后1 d、4周时术眼眼压,并对入院时及术后4周抗青光眼药物的使用情况进行统计分析;对术眼及其对侧眼进行眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评估和泪河高度(TMH)、首次非侵入性泪膜破裂时间(NIBUTf)、平均泪膜破裂时间(NIBUTav)检测,组内对术眼与其对侧眼进行比较,组间对术眼与对侧眼的差值进行比较。结果 术后1 d,CPC、CPT两组患者术眼眼压分别为(21.6±3.2)mmHg(1 kPa=7.5 mmHg)和(13.8±4.1)mmHg,差异有统计学意义(P=0.00);术后4周,CPC、CPT两组术眼眼压分别为(14.0±2.8)mmHg和(14.4±3.2)mmHg,差异无统计学意义(P=0.46)。术后4周CPC组和CPT组患者使用抗青光眼药物数量比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.53)。术后4周,CPC组术眼与对侧眼OSDI评分为(35.52±11.54)分和 (24.70±9.09)分,TMH为(0.28±0.11)mm和(0.37±0.14)mm,NIBUTf为(7.54±3.32)s和(13.77±4.05)s,NITBUTav为(10.77±3.10)s和 (16.75±3.77)s,组内比较差异均有统计学意义(均为P=0.00);CPT组术眼与对侧眼OSDI评分为(42.02±10.55)分和22(18,27)分,TMH为(0.17±0.08)mm 和(0.32±0.12)mm,NIBUTf为(5.13±2.00)s和(13.96±4.39)s,NITBUTav为(8.41±2.39)s和 (16.33±4.83)s,组内比较差异均有统计学意义(均为P=0.00)。CPC组和CPT组术眼与对侧眼差值的组间比较,OSDI、TMH、NIBUTf、NITBUTav差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05)。结论 CPC与CPT对PACG控制眼压效果相近,但CPC对眼表的损伤更轻,患者术后眼部自觉症状更少。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the anti-glaucoma efficacy and ocular surface interference after combined phacoendoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) and combined phacotrabeculectomy (CPT) in the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG). Methods A total of 101 patients (101 eyes) suffered from PACG complicated with cataract were divided into two groups according to surgical methods, and 46 patients (46 eyes) received CPC were in CPC group, and the other 55 patients (55 eyes) undergoing CPT were in CPT group. The contralateral eye of the surgery one was defined as self-control. Data related to anti-glaucoma effect, for example intraocular pressure (IOP) at entrance, on day 1 and the 4th week post-surgery, and anti-glaucoma drugs at entrance and 4th week post-surgery were collected for further comparison. In addition, ocular surface indexes including ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear meniscus height (TMH), first noninvasive tear breakup time (NIBUTf) and average non-invasive tear film break-up time (NITBUTav) were applied to evaluate ocular surface status. The indexes were compared within group between surgical eyes and their contralateral ones while the deviations derived from surgical eyes and contralateral ones were compared between groups.Results On day 1 after surgery, the IOP of surgical eyes was (21.6±3.2) mmHg (1 kPa=7.5 mmHg) in the CPC group compared with (13.8±4.1) mmHg in CPT group (P=0.00). At the 4th week after surgery, the IOP of surgical eyes was (14.0±2.8) mmHg in CPC group and (14.4±3.2)mmHg in CPT, no statistically difference was found (P=0.46). In addition, the difference in quantity of anti-glaucoma drugs at 4th week post-surgery between the two groups was of no statistical significance (P=0.53). For ocular surface evaluation, the indexes of surgical eyes and contralateral ones in CPC group at 4th week post-surgery were shown as follows:OSDI:(35.52±11.54) points vs. (24.70±9.09) points, TMH:(0.28±0.11) mm vs. (0.37±0.14) mm, NIBUTf:(7.54±3.32) s vs. (13.77±4.05) s, NITBUTav:(10.77±3.10)s vs. (16.75±3.77) s, and the differences were statistically significant (all P=0.00), while indexes of surgical eyes and its contralateral ones in CPT group were as follows:OSDI:(42.02±10.55) points vs. 22 (18, 27) points, TMH:(0.17±0.08) mm vs. (0.32±0.12) mm, NIBUTf:(5.13±2.00) s vs. (13.96±4.39) s, NITBUTav:(8.41±2.39) s vs. (16.33±4.83) s, and the differences were statistically significant (all P=0.00). Furthermore, the differences in the deviations from surgical eyes and contralateral eyes were of statistically significance (all P<0.05).Conclusion CPC contributes similar efficacy with CPT to PACG in IOP control, and it poses less damage to the ocular surface and be more beneficial to ocular comfort of post-surgery patients in contrast to CPT.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈君毅,孙兴怀.青光眼手术治疗方式的合理选择[J].中华实验眼科杂志,2018,36(4):241-244.
CHEN J Y,SUN X H.How to make an appropriate choice of glaucoma surgery?[J].Chin J Exp Ophthalmol,2018,36(4):241-244.
[2] NEVES MENDES C R,HIDA R Y,KASAHARA N.Ocular surface changes in eyes with glaucoma filtering blebs[J].Curr Eye Res,2012,37(4):309-311.
[3] ONO T,YUKI K,OZEKI N,SHIBA D,TSUBOTA K.Ocular surface complications after trabeculectomy:incidence,risk factors,time course and prognosis[J].Ophthalmologica,2013,230(2):93-99.
[4] 谢琳,朱小敏.抗青光眼手术滤过泡依赖性与非依赖性孰优孰劣[J].中华眼科杂志,2018,54(11):806-810.
XIE L,ZHU X M.Which is better for anti-glaucoma surgery,filtering bleb dependence or non-dependence[J].Chin J Ophthalmol,2018,54(11):806-810.
[5] PASTOR S A,SINGH K,LEE D A,JUZYCH M S,LIN S C,NETLAND P A,et al.Cyclophotocoagulation:a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology[J].Ophthalmology,2001,108:2130-2138.
[6] AMOOZGAR B,PHAN E N,LIN S C,HAN Y.Update on ciliary body laser procedures[J].Curr Opin Ophthalmol,2017,28(2):181-186.
[7] WRIGHT C,TAWFIK M A,WAISBOURD M,KATZ L J.Primary angle-closure glaucoma:an update[J].Acta Ophthalmol,2016,94(3):217-225.
[8] FRANCIS B A,BERKE S J,DUSTIN L,NOECKER R.Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation combined with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone in medically controlled glaucoma[J].J Cataract Refract Surg,2014,40(8):1313-1321.
[9] PEREZ BARTOLOME F,RODRIGUES I A,GOYAL S,BLOCH E,LIM W S,ALAGHBAND P,et al.Phacoemulsification plus endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation versus phacoemulsification alone in primary open-angle glaucoma[J].Eur J Ophthalmol,2018,28(2):168-174.
[10] MARCO S,DAMJI K F,NAZARALI S,RUDNISKY C J.Cataract and glaucoma surgery:endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation versus trabeculectomy[J].Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol,2017,24(4):177-182.
[11] LAU C S L,CHAN J C W,SO S F,CHAN O C C,LI K K W.Combined phacoendoscopic cyclophotocoagulation versus combined phacotrabeculectomy in the management of coexisting cataract and glaucoma:a comparative study[J].J Ophthalmol,2018,2018:5149154.
[12] 李璐希,刘伟,季建.小梁切除手术对眼表的影响[J].中华眼科杂志,2013,49(2):185-188.
LI L X,LIU W,JI J.The impact of trabeculectomy on ocular surface[J].Chin J Ophthalmol,2013,49(2):185-188.
[13] LEE S Y,WONG T T,CHUA J,BOO C,SOH Y F,TONG L.Effect of chronic anti-glaucoma medications and trabeculectomy on tear osmolarity[J].Eye,2013,27(10):1142-1150.
[14] LI X J,LIU W.Changes of tear film after trabeculectomy in glaucoma[J].Int Eye Sci,2015,15(7):1201-1203.
[15] AGNIFILI L,BRESCIA L,ODDONE F,SACCHI M,D’UGO E,DI MARZIO G,et al.The ocular surface after successful glaucoma filtration surgery:a clinical,in vivo confocal microscopy,and immune-cytology study[J].Sci Rep,2019,9(1):11299.
[16] AMBAW Y A,WONG T,CHONG R,AH H,JI S,RAIDA M,et al.Change of tear lipid mediators in a post-trabeculectomy cohort[J].Ocul Surf,2020,18(4):565-574.
[17] TONG L,HOU A H,WONG T T.Altered expression level of inflammation-related genes and long-term changes in ocular surface after trabeculectomy,a prospective cohort study[J].Ocul Surf,2018,16(4):441-447.
[18] CHEN J,ZHANG Z R,CHEN W.Effect of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery on function of eye surface and tear film[J].Int Eye Sci,2016,16(8):1584-1587.
[19] JIANG L,SONG Y,HUANG L L,CAO X.Comparative study of the ocular surface changes after phacotrabeculectomy and trabeculectomy[J].Int Eye Sci,2016,16(4):698-701.
[20] ZAMORA M G,CABALLERO E F,MALDONADO M J.Short-term changes in ocular surface signs and symptoms after phacoemulsification[J].Eur J Ophthalmol,2020,30(6):1301-1307.
[21] TRINH L,BRIGNOLE-BAUDOUIN F,PAULY A,LIANG H,HOUSSIE M,BAUDOUIN C.Th1 and Th2 related chemokine and chemokine receptor expression on the ocular surface in endotoxin induced uveitis[J].Mol Vis,2008,14:2428-2434.
[22] TRINH L,BRIGNOLE-BAUDOUIN F,RAPHAEL M,DUPONT-MONOD S,CASSOUX N,LEHOANG P,et al.Th1 and Th2 responses on the ocular surface in uveitis identified by CCR4 and CCR5 conjunctival expression[J].Am J Ophthalmol,2007,144(4):580-585.
[23] CARRENO E,PORTERO A,HERRERAS J M,GARCIA-VAZQUEZ C,WHITCUP S M,STERN M E,et al.Cytokine and chemokine tear levels in patients with uveitis[J].Acta Ophthalmol,2017,95(5):e405-e414.
[24] MIZOGUCHI S,IWANISHI H,ARITA R,SHIRAI K,SUMIOKA T,KOKADO M,et al.Ocular surface inflammation impairs structure and function of meibomian gland[J].Exp Eye Res,2017,163:78-84.
[25] ZHANG X,M V J,QU Y,HE X,OU S,BU J,et al.Dry eye management:targeting the ocular surface microenvironment[J].Int J Mol Sci,2017,18(7):1398.

相似文献/References:

[1]李翔 谢钊 郭红建 谢学军 路雪婧 王毅 王超.补肾活血中药对大鼠慢性高眼压模型外侧膝状体病理改变的影响[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(1):000.
[2]范虹 刘五存 蔡鸿英 赵堪兴.改良二极管激光睫状体光凝术治疗中晚期青光眼[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(4):000.
[3]王建萍 赵燕麟 马勇 朱涛 程燕 车选义 赵桂娥 王柯.噻吗洛尔和布林佐胺联合曲伏前列素治疗原发性开角型青光眼与高眼压患者的临床研究[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(5):000.
[4]彭坤 靳隽 杨玉新 许银霞 王保君 闫义涛 杨华.长期联合应用噻吗洛尔对结膜组织炎性标记物ICAM-1和HLA-DR表达的影响[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(6):000.
[5]马恩普 赵小钊 董良 刘苏冰 曾照年.Healaflow在青光眼小梁切除术中的应用[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(6):000.
[6]王勇 叶应嘉 鲍先议 周龑丽 许荣 彭婷婷 曾志富.同轴微小切口超声乳化吸出术在青光眼滤过术后白内障摘出术中的应用[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(7):000.
[7]李翔 马世勇 李娟 王毅.补肾活血中药对大鼠慢性高眼压模型视神经病理改变的影响[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(2):000.
[8]白东娥 刘伟 季建.抗青光眼药物对青光眼患者泪液胰岛素水平的影响及其与眼表改变的关系[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(6):000.
[9]马英慧 张铁民 齐建平.原发性开角型青光眼与慢性原发性闭角型青光眼视网膜神经纤维层厚度与视野缺损的关系[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(7):000.
[10]张海涛 杨玉新 毛永 丁晓丽 秦海霞 梁长华 郭英昌.青光眼与非炎症性缺血型视神经病变的傅立叶OCT扫描视神经形态学对比[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(8):000.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
苏州市临床重点项目诊疗技术专项项目(编号:LCZX201825)
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-07-05